Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and laboratory parameters associated with cycle outcomes in patients undergoing euploid frozen blastocyst transfer.
Melado Vidales, Laura; Lawrenz, Barbara; Vitorino, Raquel Loja; Patel, Rachana; Ruiz, Francisco Javier; Marques, Laura Marqueta; Bayram, Asina; Elkhatib, Ibrahim; Fatemi, Human.
Afiliação
  • Melado Vidales L; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address: laura.melado@artfertilityclinics.com.
  • Lawrenz B; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Women's University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Vitorino RL; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Patel R; ART Fertility Clinics, New Delhi, India.
  • Ruiz FJ; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Marques LM; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Bayram A; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Elkhatib I; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Fatemi H; ART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 46(6): 917-925, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37062636
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION Which factors impact on clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) in euploid frozen embryo transfer (eFET) cycles?

DESIGN:

Retrospective observational study including 1660 eFET cycles with 2439 euploid blastocysts, from November 2016 to December 2020. The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on CPR, biochemical miscarriage rate (BMR), clinical miscarriage rate (CMR) and LBR was evaluated.

RESULTS:

CPR per transfer was 63.4%, LBR per transfer 51.6%. CPR and LBR were significantly higher when double embryo transfer (DET) was performed (71.6% versus 57.7%, P < 0.001; 55.2% versus 49.1%, P = 0.016, respectively). However, pregnancy loss was significantly higher in the DET group (28.8% versus 22.8%, P = 0.02). When patients were classified by body mass index (BMI), no differences were observed for CPR, but CMR was lower (P < 0.001) and LBR higher (p = 0.031) for the normal BMI group. The natural cycle protocol revealed lower CMR (P < 0.001) and lower pregnancy loss (P < 0.001); subsequently, higher LBR (57.6%, 48.8%, 45.0%, P = 0.001) compared with hormonal replacement protocol and stimulated cycle. Day of trophectoderm biopsy affected CPR (P < 0.001) and LBR (P < 0.001), yet no differences were observed for BMR, CMR or pregnancy loss. The multivariate analysis showed that day 6/7 embryos had lower probabilities for pregnancy; overweight and obesity had a negative impact on LBR, and natural cycle improved LBR (adjusted odds ratio 1.445, 95% confidence interval 0.519-0.806).

CONCLUSIONS:

Day of biopsy affected CPR, while BMI and endometrial preparation protocol were associated with LBR in eFET. DET should be discouraged as it will increase the risk of pregnancy loss. Women with higher BMI should be aware of the higher risk of pregnancy loss and lower LBR even though a euploid blastocyst is transferred.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Espontâneo Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Espontâneo Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article