Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medical cannabis is effective for cancer-related pain: Quebec Cannabis Registry results.
Aprikian, Saro; Kasvis, Popi; Vigano, MariaLuisa; Hachem, Yasmina; Canac-Marquis, Michelle; Vigano, Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Aprikian S; School of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kasvis P; Medical Cannabis Program in Oncology, Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Vigano M; McGill Nutrition and Performance Laboratory, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Hachem Y; Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Canac-Marquis M; McGill Nutrition and Performance Laboratory, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Vigano A; Department of Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 13(e3): e1285-e1291, 2024 Jan 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37130724
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical cannabis (MC) in reducing pain and concurrent medications in patients with cancer.

METHODS:

This study analysed data collected from patients with cancer who were part of the Quebec Cannabis Registry. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) questionnaires, total medication burden (TMB) and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) recorded at 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month follow-ups were compared with baseline values. Adverse events were also documented at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS:

This study included 358 patients with cancer. Thirteen out of 15 adverse events reported in 11 patients were not serious; 2 serious events (pneumonia and cardiovascular event) were considered unlikely related to MC. Statistically significant decreases were observed at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up for BPI worst pain (5.5±0.7 baseline, 3.6±0.7, 3.6±0.7, 3.6±0.8; p<0.01), average pain (4.1±0.6 baseline, 2.4±0.6, 2.3±0.6, 2.7±0.7; p<0.01), overall pain severity (3.7±0.5 baseline, 2.3±0.6, 2.3±0.6, 2.4±0.6; p<0.01) and pain interference (4.3±0.6 baseline, 2.4±0.6, 2.2±0.6, 2.4±0.7, p<0.01). ESAS-r pain scores decreased significantly at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up (3.7±0.6 baseline, 2.5±0.6, 2.2±0.6, 2.0±0.7, p<0.01). THCCBD balanced strains were associated with better pain relief as compared with THC-dominant and CBD-dominant strains. Decreases in TMB were observed at all follow-ups. Decreases in MEDD were observed at the first three follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Real-world data from this large, prospective, multicentre registry indicate that MC is a safe and effective complementary treatment for pain relief in patients with cancer. Our findings should be confirmed through randomised placebo-controlled trials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Maconha Medicinal / Dor do Câncer Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Maconha Medicinal / Dor do Câncer Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article