Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Behavioral responses to offshore windfarms during migration of a declining shorebird species revealed by GPS-telemetry.
Schwemmer, Philipp; Mercker, Moritz; Haecker, Karena; Kruckenberg, Helmut; Kämpfer, Steffen; Bocher, Pierrick; Fort, Jérôme; Jiguet, Frédéric; Franks, Samantha; Elts, Jaanus; Marja, Riho; Piha, Markus; Rousseau, Pierre; Pederson, Rebecca; Düttmann, Heinz; Fartmann, Thomas; Garthe, Stefan.
Afiliação
  • Schwemmer P; Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), University of Kiel, Hafentörn 1, 25761 Büsum, Germany. Electronic address: schwemmer@ftz-west.uni-kiel.de.
  • Mercker M; Bionum GmbH - Consultants in Biological Statistics, 21129, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Haecker K; Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), University of Kiel, Hafentörn 1, 25761 Büsum, Germany.
  • Kruckenberg H; Institute for Wetlands and Waterbird Research e.V., Am Steigbügel 3, 27283, Verden, Germany.
  • Kämpfer S; Department of Biodiversity and Landscape Ecology, Osnabrück University, Barberstraße 11, 49076, Osnabrück, Germany.
  • Bocher P; Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 La Rochelle University - CNRS, 2 Rue Olympe de Gouges, 17000, La Rochelle, France.
  • Fort J; Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266 La Rochelle University - CNRS, 2 Rue Olympe de Gouges, 17000, La Rochelle, France.
  • Jiguet F; UMR7204 CESCO, Museum National D'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, 43 Rue Buffon, CP135, 75005, Paris, France.
  • Franks S; British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, IP24 2PU, United Kingdom; Wash Wader Research Group, The Old School House, Terrington St Clement, PE34 4H, UK.
  • Elts J; BirdLife Estonia, Veski 4, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Marja R; BirdLife Estonia, Veski 4, 51005, Tartu, Estonia; 'Lendület' Landscape and Conservation Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research, Alkotmány u. 2-4, 2163, Vácrátót, Hungary.
  • Piha M; Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland; Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P. Rautatiekatu 13, 00101, Finland.
  • Rousseau P; National Nature Reserve of Moëze-Oléron, LPO Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux, Plaisance, 17780, Saint-Froult, France.
  • Pederson R; Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), University of Kiel, Hafentörn 1, 25761 Büsum, Germany.
  • Düttmann H; Heinz Düttmann, Am Bleißmer 25, 31683, Obernkirchen, Germany.
  • Fartmann T; Department of Biodiversity and Landscape Ecology, Osnabrück University, Barberstraße 11, 49076, Osnabrück, Germany; Institute of Biodiversity and Landscape Ecology (IBL), An der Kleimannbrücke 98, 48157, Münster, Germany.
  • Garthe S; Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), University of Kiel, Hafentörn 1, 25761 Büsum, Germany.
J Environ Manage ; 342: 118131, 2023 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210816
ABSTRACT
EU member countries and the UK are currently installing numerous offshore windfarms (OWFs) in the Baltic and North Seas to achieve decarbonization of their energy systems. OWFs may have adverse effects on birds; however, estimates of collision risks and barrier effects for migratory species are notably lacking, but are essential to inform marine spatial planning. We therefore compiled an international dataset consisting of 259 migration tracks for 143 Global Positioning System-tagged Eurasian curlews (Numenius arquata arquata) from seven European countries recorded over 6 years, to assess individual response behaviors when approaching OWFs in the North and Baltic Seas at two different spatial scales (i.e. up to 3.5 km and up to 30 km distance). Generalized additive mixed models revealed a significant small-scale increase in flight altitudes, which was strongest at 0-500 m from the OWF and which was more pronounced during autumn than during spring, due to higher proportions of time spent migrating at rotor level. Furthermore, four different small-scale integrated step selection models consistently detected horizontal avoidance responses in about 70% of approaching curlews, which was strongest at approximately 450 m from the OWFs. No distinct, large-scale avoidance effects were observed on the horizontal plane, although they could possibly have been confounded by changes in flight altitudes close to land. Overall, 28.8% of the flight tracks crossed OWFs at least once during migration. Flight altitudes within the OWFs overlapped with the rotor level to a high degree in autumn (50%) but to a significantly lesser extent in spring (18.5%). Approximately 15.8% and 5.8% of the entire curlew population were estimated to be at increased risk during autumn and spring migration, respectively. Our data clearly show strong small-scale avoidance responses, which are likely to reduce collision risk, but simultaneously highlight the substantial barrier effect of OWFs for migrating species. Although alterations in flight paths of curlews due to OWFs seem to be moderate with respect to the overall migration route, there is an urgent need to quantify the respective energetic costs, given the massive ongoing construction of OWFs in both sea areas.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vento / Charadriiformes Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vento / Charadriiformes Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article