Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Temporal changes in characteristics and external validity of randomized controlled trials in older people from 2012 to 2019.
van Eijk, Estelle; van der Spek, Yanna M; van Deudekom, Floor J A; van den Bos, Frederiek; Mooijaart, Simon P; Trompet, Stella.
Afiliação
  • van Eijk E; Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • van der Spek YM; Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • van Deudekom FJA; Department of Geriatrics, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van den Bos F; Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Mooijaart SP; Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Trompet S; LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 324, 2023 05 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226093
BACKGROUND: Older individuals are often underrepresented in clinical trials. In 2012 only 7% of RCT's specifically studied older people and their geriatric characteristics were poorly reported. The aim of this review was to investigate temporal changes in characteristics and external validity of randomized controlled trials in older people from 2012 to 2019. METHODS: PubMed was searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in 2019. Firstly, the proportion of RCTs specially designed for older people were determined by the following criteria: a reported mean age of ≥ 70 years or a lower age cutoff of ≥ 55. Secondly, the trials with a majority of older people, defined by a reported mean age of ≥ 60 years, were screened for reporting of geriatric assessments. Both parts were compared with identical reviews performed in 2012. RESULTS: From a 10% random sample, 1446 RCTs were included in this systematic review. First, 8% of trials were specifically designed for older people in 2019 compared to 7% in 2012. Secondly, 25% of the trials included a majority of older people in 2019, compared to 22% in 2012. Thirdly, in 52% of these trials in 2019 one or more of the geriatric assessments were reported compared to 34% in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Although in 2019 the proportion of published RCTs specifically designed for older people remains low, more characteristics on geriatric assessments were reported compared to 2012. Continued efforts should be paid to increase both the number and the validity of trials for older people.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Avaliação Geriátrica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Avaliação Geriátrica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article