Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current status of transcatheter mitral valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alperi, Alberto; Avanzas, Pablo; Leon, Victor; Silva, Iria; Hernández-Vaquero, Daniel; Almendárez, Marcel; Álvarez, Rut; Fernández, Félix; Moris, Cesar; Pascual, Isaac.
Afiliação
  • Alperi A; Department of Cardiology, Heart Area, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Avanzas P; Health Research Institute of Asturias (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias), Oviedo, Spain.
  • Leon V; Department of Cardiology, Heart Area, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Silva I; Health Research Institute of Asturias (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias), Oviedo, Spain.
  • Hernández-Vaquero D; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Almendárez M; Department of Cardiology, Heart Area, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Álvarez R; Department of Cardiology, Heart Area, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Fernández F; Department of Cardiology, Heart Area, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Moris C; Health Research Institute of Asturias (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias), Oviedo, Spain.
  • Pascual I; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 10: 1130212, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37234369
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Mitral Regurgitation (MR) has a strong impact on quality of life and on mid-term survival. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is rapidly expanding and a growing number of studies have been published recently.

Methods:

A systematic review of studies reporting on clinical data for patients with symptomatic severe MR undergoing TMVR was performed. Early- and mid-term outcomes (clinical and echocardiographic) were evaluated. Overall weighted means and rates were calculated. Risk ratios or mean differences were calculated for pre- and post-procedural comparisons.

Results:

A total of 12 studies and 347 patients who underwent TMVR with devices clinically available or under clinical evaluation were included. Thirty-day mortality, stroke and major bleeding rates were 8.4%, 2.6%, and 15.6%, respectively. Pooled random-effects demonstrated a significant reduction of ≥ grade 3+ MR (RR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02-0.11; p < 0.001) and in the rates of patients in NYHA class 3-4 after the intervention (RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.22-0.34; p < 0.001). Additionally, the pooled fixed-effect mean difference for quality of life based on the KCCQ score yielded an improvement in 12.9 points (95% CI7.4-18.4, p < 0.001), and exercise capacity improved by a pooled fixed-effect mean difference of 56.8 meters in the 6-minute walk test (95% CI 32.2-81.3, p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Among 12 studies and 347 patients comprising the updated evidence with current TMVR systems there was a statistically significant reduction in ≥ grade 3+ MR and in the number of patients exhibiting poor functional class (NYHA 3 or 4) after the intervention. Overall rate of major bleeding was the main shortcoming of this technique.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article