Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Craniofacial Microsomia, Associated Congenital Anomalies, and Risk Factors in 63 Cases from the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System.
Thomas, Mary Ann; Bedard, Tanya; Crawford, Susan; Grevers, Xin; Lowry, R Brian.
Afiliação
  • Thomas MA; Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medi
  • Bedard T; Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Crawford S; Alberta Perinatal Health Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Grevers X; Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Lowry RB; Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medi
J Pediatr ; 261: 113528, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268037
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To report associated congenital anomalies with unexplained craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and the phenotypic overlap with other recurrent constellations of embryonic malformations (RCEM), and to assess prenatal and perinatal risk factors. STUDY

DESIGN:

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. Cases with CFM, delivered between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2019, were abstracted from the population-based Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System. Livebirths, stillbirths, and early fetal losses were reviewed to include all types of pregnancy outcomes along the spectrum of this condition. Prenatal and perinatal risk factors were compared with the Alberta birth population to assess differences between the 2 groups.

RESULTS:

There were 63 cases with CFM, yielding a frequency of 1 per 16 949. There was a high rate of cases (65%) with anomalies outside the craniofacial and vertebral regions. Congenital heart defects were the most common (33.3%). A single umbilical artery was found in 12.7% of cases. The twin/triplet rate of 12.7% was significantly higher than the Alberta rate of 3.3% (P < .0001). There was an overlap with a second RCEM condition in 9.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although CFM is primarily a craniofacial condition, the majority of cases have congenital anomalies affecting other systems requiring additional assessments, including an echocardiogram, renal ultrasound examination, and a complete vertebral radiograph. The high rate of an associated single umbilical artery raises the possibility of a related etiological mechanism. Our findings support the proposed concept of RCEM conditions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artéria Umbilical Única / Síndrome de Goldenhar Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artéria Umbilical Única / Síndrome de Goldenhar Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article