Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Major mixed motility disorders: An important subset of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.
Leopold, Andrew R; Jalalian, Aria; Thaker, Parth; Wellington, Jennifer; Papademetriou, Marianna; Xie, Guofeng.
Afiliação
  • Leopold AR; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Jalalian A; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Thaker P; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Wellington J; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Papademetriou M; Atrium Health Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Xie G; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Washington DC Medical Center, Washington, D.C., USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 35(7): e14555, 2023 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37309619
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by a lack of relaxation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), with preserved esophageal body peristalsis. We propose new terminology for the coexistence of EGJOO with hypercontractile esophagus and distal esophageal spasm as a major mixed motility disorder (MMMD), and normal peristalsis or a minor disorder of peristalsis such as ineffective esophageal motility with EGJOO as isolated or ineffective EGJOO (IEGJOO). METHODS: We reviewed prior diagnoses of EGJOO, stratified diagnoses as IEGJOO or MMMD, and compared their symptomatic presentations, high-resolution manometry (HRM) and endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) metrics, and treatment responses at 2-6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Out of a total of 821 patients, 142 met CCv3 criteria for EGJOO. Twenty-two were confirmed by CCv4 and EndoFLIP as having EGJOO and were clinically managed. Thirteen had MMMD, and nine had IEGJOO. Groups had no difference in demographic data or presenting symptoms by Eckardt score (ES). HRM showed MMMD had greater distal contractile integral, frequency of hypercontractile swallows, and frequency of spastic swallows, and greater DI by EndoFLIP. Patients with MMMD showed greater reduction in symptoms after LES-directed intervention when measured by ES compared with IEGJOO (7.2 vs. 4.0). CONCLUSION: Patients with MMMD and IEGJOO present similarly. Detectable differences in HRM portend different responses to endoscopic therapy. Because patients with MMMD have greater short-term prognosis, they should be considered a different diagnostic classification to guide therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gastropatias / Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gastropatias / Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article