Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Artificial Intelligence-Based PTEN Loss Assessment as an Early Predictor of Prostate Cancer Metastasis After Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Patel, Palak; Harmon, Stephanie; Iseman, Rachael; Ludkowski, Olga; Auman, Heidi; Hawley, Sarah; Newcomb, Lisa F; Lin, Daniel W; Nelson, Peter S; Feng, Ziding; Boyer, Hilary D; Tretiakova, Maria S; True, Larry D; Vakar-Lopez, Funda; Carroll, Peter R; Cooperberg, Matthew R; Chan, Emily; Simko, Jeff; Fazli, Ladan; Gleave, Martin; Hurtado-Coll, Antonio; Thompson, Ian M; Troyer, Dean; McKenney, Jesse K; Wei, Wei; Choyke, Peter L; Bratslavsky, Gennady; Turkbey, Baris; Siemens, D Robert; Squire, Jeremy; Peng, Yingwei P; Brooks, James D; Jamaspishvili, Tamara.
Afiliação
  • Patel P; Department of Cell Biology at The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Harmon S; Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; Artificial Intelligence Resource, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Iseman R; Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ludkowski O; University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Auman H; Canary Foundation, Woodside, California.
  • Hawley S; Canary Foundation, Woodside, California.
  • Newcomb LF; Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Lin DW; Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Nelson PS; Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Feng Z; Program of Biostatistics and Biomathematics, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Boyer HD; Program of Biostatistics and Biomathematics, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Tretiakova MS; Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • True LD; Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Vakar-Lopez F; Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Carroll PR; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Cooperberg MR; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Chan E; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Simko J; Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California; Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Fazli L; The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Gleave M; The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Hurtado-Coll A; The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Thompson IM; CHRISTUS Medical Center Hospital, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Troyer D; Department of Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia; Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
  • McKenney JK; Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Wei W; Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Choyke PL; Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Bratslavsky G; Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Turkbey B; Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; Artificial Intelligence Resource, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Siemens DR; Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Squire J; Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  • Peng YP; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Brooks JD; Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
  • Jamaspishvili T; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York. Electronic address: jamaspit@upstate.edu.
Mod Pathol ; 36(10): 100241, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37343766
ABSTRACT
Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss is associated with adverse outcomes in prostate cancer and can be measured via immunohistochemistry. The purpose of the study was to establish the clinical application of an in-house developed artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis workflow for automated detection of PTEN loss on digital images for identifying patients at risk of early recurrence and metastasis. Postsurgical tissue microarray sections from the Canary Foundation (n = 1264) stained with anti-PTEN antibody were evaluated independently by pathologist conventional visual scoring (cPTEN) and an automated AI-based image analysis pipeline (AI-PTEN). The relationship of PTEN evaluation methods with cancer recurrence and metastasis was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard and decision curve models. Both cPTEN scoring by the pathologist and quantification of PTEN loss by AI (high-risk AI-qPTEN) were significantly associated with shorter metastasis-free survival (MFS) in univariable analysis (cPTEN hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; CI, 1.07-2.21; P = .019; AI-qPTEN HR, 2.55; CI, 1.83-3.56; P < .001). In multivariable analyses, AI-qPTEN showed a statistically significant association with shorter MFS (HR, 2.17; CI, 1.49-3.17; P < .001) and recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.36; CI, 1.06-1.75; P = .016) when adjusting for relevant postsurgical clinical nomogram (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment [CAPRA] postsurgical score [CAPRA-S]), whereas cPTEN does not show a statistically significant association (HR, 1.33; CI, 0.89-2; P = .2 and HR, 1.26; CI, 0.99-1.62; P = .063, respectively) when adjusting for CAPRA-S risk stratification. More importantly, AI-qPTEN was associated with shorter MFS in patients with favorable pathological stage and negative surgical margins (HR, 2.72; CI, 1.46-5.06; P = .002). Workflow also demonstrated enhanced clinical utility in decision curve analysis, more accurately identifying men who might benefit from adjuvant therapy postsurgery. This study demonstrates the clinical value of an affordable and fully automated AI-powered PTEN assessment for evaluating the risk of developing metastasis or disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Adding the AI-qPTEN assessment workflow to clinical variables may affect postoperative surveillance or management options, particularly in low-risk patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article