Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Walking ability of individuals fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses: A comparative study of gait parameters.
Ranaldi, Simone; Naaim, Alexandre; Marchis, Cristiano De; Robert, Thomas; Dumas, Raphael; Conforto, Silvia; Frossard, Laurent.
Afiliação
  • Ranaldi S; BioLab³ - Engineering Department, Roma TRE University, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
  • Naaim A; Univ Lyon, Univ Gustave Eiffel, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LBMC UMR T_9406, Lyon, France.
  • Marchis C; Department of Engineering, University of Messina, Messina, Sicilia, Italy.
  • Robert T; Univ Lyon, Univ Gustave Eiffel, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LBMC UMR T_9406, Lyon, France.
  • Dumas R; Univ Lyon, Univ Gustave Eiffel, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LBMC UMR T_9406, Lyon, France.
  • Conforto S; BioLab³ - Engineering Department, Roma TRE University, Rome, Lazio, Italy.
  • Frossard L; Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Clin Rehabil ; 37(12): 1670-1683, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37350084
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study presents the walking abilities of participants fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses using a total of 14 gait parameters.

DESIGN:

Two-centre retrospective cross-sectional comparative study.

SETTING:

Research facilities equipped with tridimensional motion capture systems.

PARTICIPANTS:

Two control arms included eight able-bodied participants arm (54 ± 9 years, 1.75 ± 0.07 m, 76 ± 7 kg) and nine participants fitted with transfemoral socket-suspended prostheses arm (59 ± 9 years, 1.73 ± 0.07 m, 80 ± 16 kg). The intervention arm included nine participants fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses arm (51 ± 13 years, 1.78 ± 0.09 m, 87.3 ± 16.1 kg). INTERVENTION Fitting of transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses. MAIN

MEASURES:

Comparisons were performed for two spatio-temporal, three spatial and nine temporal gait parameters.

RESULTS:

The cadence and speed of walking were 107 ± 6 steps/min and 1.23 ± 0.19 m/s for the able-bodied participants arm, 88 ± 7 steps/min and 0.87 ± 0.17 m/s for the socket-suspended prosthesis arm, and 96 ± 6 steps/min and 1.03 ± 0.17 m/s for bone-anchored prosthesis arm, respectively. Able-bodied participants and bone-anchored prosthesis arms were comparable in age, height, and body mass index as well as cadence and speed of walking, but the able-bodied participant arm showed a swing phase 31% shorter. Bone-anchored and socket-suspended prostheses arms were comparable for age, height, mass, and body mass index as well as cadence and speed of walking, but the bone-anchored prosthesis arm showed a step width and duration of double support in seconds 65% and 41% shorter, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bone-anchored and socket-suspended prostheses restored equally well the gait parameters at a self-selected speed. This benchmark data provides new insights into the walking ability of individuals using transfemoral bionics bone-anchored prostheses.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Membros Artificiais / Prótese Ancorada no Osso / Amputados Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Membros Artificiais / Prótese Ancorada no Osso / Amputados Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article