Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of minimally invasive surgery in resectable distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Chang, Jenny H; Hossain, Mir S; Stackhouse, Kathryn; Dahdaleh, Fadi; Denbo, Jason; Augustin, Toms; Simon, Robert; Joyce, Daniel; Matthew Walsh, R; Naffouje, Samer.
Afiliação
  • Chang JH; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Hossain MS; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Stackhouse K; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Dahdaleh F; Edward-Elmhurst Medical Group, Department of Surgical Oncology, Naperville, IL, USA.
  • Denbo J; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Augustin T; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Simon R; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Joyce D; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Matthew Walsh R; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Naffouje S; Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: naffous@ccf.org.
HPB (Oxford) ; 25(10): 1213-1222, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357114
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), we hypothesize that minimally invasive DP (MIDP) carries short-term benefits over ODP (ODP) in the absence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

METHODS:

NSQIP database was queried to select patients who underwent DP for PDAC with available report on POPF. The population was divided into No-POPF vs. POPF groups. In each group, propensity-score matching was applied to compare 30-day outcomes of ODP vs. MIDP.

RESULTS:

There were 2,824 patients; 2,332 (82%) had No-POPF and 492 (21%) had POPF. In No-POPF patients, 921 pairs were matched between ODP and MIDP. MIDP patients had slightly longer operations (227 vs. 205 minutes; p < 0.001), but lower rates of surgical site complications (1% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.002), postoperative transfusion (7.1% vs. 11.0%; p = 0.003), overall morbidity (21.1% vs. 26.3%; p = 0.009), and one-day shorter median length of stay (LOS) (5 vs. 6 days; p = 0.001). In the POPF group, 172 pairs were matched. There was no difference in morbidity, mortality, reoperation, LOS, and home discharge. Similar conclusions were drawn in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

CONCLUSION:

POPF is common following DP for PDAC. In the absence of POPF, MIDP is associated with fewer postoperative morbidities and shorter LOS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma / Laparoscopia / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma / Laparoscopia / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article