Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Components of high-resolution manometry that change surgical decisions.
Wiese, Georg; Delgado, Carlos; Inayat, Irteza; Eubanks, Steve.
Afiliação
  • Wiese G; General Surgery Department, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA. Georg.Wiese.MD@adventhealth.com.
  • Delgado C; , 2415 North Orange Avenue, Suite 400, Orlando, FL, 32804, USA. Georg.Wiese.MD@adventhealth.com.
  • Inayat I; Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, CA, Loma Linda, USA. Georg.Wiese.MD@adventhealth.com.
  • Eubanks S; General Surgery Residency Program, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 37(9): 7060-7063, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37365391
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is vital in evaluating patients for surgery at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Previously, we reported manometry alters surgery choices at the GE junction over 50% of the time, and its components, i.e., abnormal motility and distal contractile integral (DCI), are vital in decision-making. This single-institution retrospective study examines how HRM characteristics, reported with the Chicago classification, can alter the intended surgical plans for foregut surgery.

METHODS:

We collected data on pre-operative symptoms for patients undergoing HRM studies from 2012 to 2016, i.e., Upper GI X-rays, 48-h pH studies, DeMeester scores, upper endoscopy, and biopsy reports. HRM results were further categorized via Chicago classification (i.e., normal or abnormal motility). The DCI was determined; Patients not seen by a surgeon were excluded. Then a single surgeon, blinded to patient identity and HRM results, determined the planned procedure. The reviewer was then exposed to the HRM results; procedural plans were revised if needed. HRM results were then evaluated to determine which factors most influenced the surgical decisions.

RESULTS:

298 HRM studies were initially identified; 114 met search criteria. Overall, HRM altered the planned procedure in 50.9% of cases (n = 58), with abnormal motility in 54.4% (62/114) cases. Abnormal motility findings corresponded to 70.6% (41/58) of the patients in which HRM changed the surgery decision. A DCI of < 1000 was identified in only 31.6% (36/114) of all patients, but 39.7% (23/58) of cases where the surgical decision was altered. A DCI of > 5000 was identified in only 10.5% (12/114) of all patients but 10.3% (6/58) of cases with altered surgical decisions. A DCI < 1000 and abnormal motility were generally associated with a partial fundoplication.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates the impact of identifying abnormal motility via the Chicago classification and factors like DCI on surgical choice at the GE junction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica / Refluxo Gastroesofágico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica / Refluxo Gastroesofágico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article