Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of residual antibacterial effects on canine skin surface and hair following treatment with five commercial mousse products against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.
Wu, Chi-Yen; Parsiola, Rebecca; Mitchell, Mark; Mitchell, Maria; Ramos, Sara; Ravera, Ivan; Pucheu-Haston, Cherie.
Afiliação
  • Wu CY; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Parsiola R; Dermatology for Animals, Gilbert, Arizona, USA.
  • Mitchell M; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Mitchell M; Louisiana Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Ramos S; Capital Area Veterinary Specialists, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Ravera I; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Pucheu-Haston C; Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Vet Dermatol ; 34(6): 495-504, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37434336
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Antibacterial effect studies of commercial antiseptics typically have evaluated hair and not the skin.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the antibacterial effects of mousse products on both canine skin and hair. ANIMALS Fifteen short-haired and eight long-haired dogs without skin disease. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Five mousses were applied once (1) 2% chlorhexidine and 2% miconazole; (2) 0.05% phytosphingosine; (3) 2% salicylic acid and 10% ethyl lactate; (4) 3% chlorhexidine and 0.5% climbazole; and (5) 2% chlorhexidine and 1% ketoconazole. Skin swabs and hair were collected from application sites before treatment, and at 1 h and at Day (D)2, D4, D8, D10 and D14 post-treatment. Skin swabs and hair were placed on Mueller-Hinton plates inoculated with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius inoculum suspension. Inhibition zones were measured after incubation.

RESULTS:

Inhibition was not noted with mousses 2 and 3. In mousse 5, inhibition zone sizes produced by swabs from long- and short-haired dogs were not significantly different (p = 0.105), and all swabs and hair produced inhibition until D14, regardless of hair length. By contrast, in mousse 1, inhibition zones produced by swabs from long-haired dogs were smaller than those from short-haired dogs (p < 0.001), and swabs from long-haired dogs produced a shorter duration of bacterial inhibition than hair. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The antibacterial effects of mousse 5 were not affected by hair length. Hair may be acceptable for evaluating effects on the skin in short-haired dogs. However, long hair may interfere with product distribution and duration of bacterial inhibition. Therefore, the evaluation of hair alone may overestimate clinically relevant antibacterial effects.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Clorexidina / Doenças do Cão Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Clorexidina / Doenças do Cão Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article