Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding potentially avoidable hospitalisations in a rural Australian setting from the perspectives of patients and health professionals: a qualitative study and logic model.
Glenister, Kristen; Archbold, Tessa; Moran, Anna; Kidd, David; Wilson, Sue; Disler, Rebecca.
Afiliação
  • Glenister K; Department of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, Wangaratta, Albury-Wodonga, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Archbold T; Northeast Health Wangaratta, Wangaratta, Victoria, Australia.
  • Moran A; Department of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, Wangaratta, Albury-Wodonga, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kidd D; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Regional team, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wilson S; Albury Wodonga Health, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia.
  • Disler R; Department of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, Wangaratta, Albury-Wodonga, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia.
Integr Healthc J ; 4(1): e000124, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37440860
ABSTRACT

Background:

Potentially avoidable hospitalisations (PAHs) are proxy measures of effective primary care at a population level. PAHs are higher in rural and disadvantaged areas. This qualitative study sought a deeper understanding of PAHs for chronic health conditions in a rural context from the perspectives of patients and health professionals, and aimed to develop a logic model for rural health services to identify intervention targets.

Methods:

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive cardiac failure or type 2 diabetes, admitted to a rural hospital in Australia and local health professionals were invited to participate in interviews in late 2019. Semistructured interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Themes were mapped against a programme logic model developed in a similar study.

Results:

patients and 16 health professionals participated. The logic model encompassed patient level (knowledge, skills, health status), provider level (workforce availability, attributes) and system level (clinical pathways) contexts. These contexts influenced key mechanisms of relationships, continuity of care and capacity to offer services. Outcomes included responsive and timely access to care, improved clinical outcomes and resource use. Themes that did not readily map to the logic model included socioeconomic disadvantage and healthcare costs, which influenced affordability and equity of access.

Conclusion:

Patients' complex health and social circumstance, health service access and unclear care pathways were strong themes associated with PAH in this rural context. Patient, provider and system contexts influencing key mechanisms and outcomes need to be understood when designing solutions to address PAHs in rural settings. Ideally, interventions should address the cost of healthcare alongside interventions to enhance relationships, continuity of care and capacity to offer services.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article