Non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes in adults without diabetes: deciphering the WHO recommendations in the Indian context.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) assessed the health outcomes of non-sugar sweeteners (NSS) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PCSs) and reported conflicting findings. We aim to decipher these conflicting findings in RCTs and PCSs by critically reviewing their results, comparing them with previous meta-analyses, and providing a simplified interpretation including the Indian perspective. METHODS: We critically reviewed the 210-page dossier of WHO including the full text of most of the key studies of NSS included in this meta-analysis and subsequently compared it with previous meta-analyses to identify similarities and differences to address a few key questions pertaining to health outcomes associated with NSS use in adults. RESULTS: Poor health outcomes are often associated with excess sugar intake. While NSS are typically consumed as a sugar replacement, benefits are conflicting. While RCTs found some benefits in the short term, PCSs found harm associated with NSS use in the long term. CONCLUSION: The 2022 WHO meta-analysis that assessed the health outcomes of NSS is the most robust and critically analyzed document available to date. Despite the absence of any strong conclusion that suggests NSS consumption increases the risk of cardio-metabolic disorders, no firm evidence also rejects this statement. NSS could be an attractive replacement for sugar in overweight/obese people in the short term, but long-term harm cannot be fully ruled out. We suggest avoiding consuming sugar and restricting NSS intake wherever possible until long-term studies confirm or refute these findings.