Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to and facilitators of physical activity in adults living with and beyond cancer, with special emphasis on head and neck cancer: a systematic review of qualitative and mixed methods studies.
Doughty, Hannah C; Hill, Ruaraidh A; Riley, Andrew; Midgley, Adrian W; Patterson, Joanne M; Boddy, Lynne M; Rogers, Simon N; Maden, Michelle; Williams, Nefyn H.
Afiliação
  • Doughty HC; Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. Hannah.Doughty@liverpool.ac.uk.
  • Hill RA; Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, L69 3GL, Liverpool, UK.
  • Riley A; Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
  • Midgley AW; Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, L39 4QP, UK.
  • Patterson JM; Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, L69 3GB, Liverpool, UK.
  • Boddy LM; The Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 2EX, UK.
  • Rogers SN; Head and Neck Centre, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK.
  • Maden M; Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, L69 3GL, Liverpool, UK.
  • Williams NH; Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(8): 471, 2023 Jul 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458858
PURPOSE: Physical activity can improve health outcomes for cancer patients; however, only 30% of patients are physically active. This review explored barriers to and facilitators of physical activity promotion and participation in patients living with and beyond cancer. Secondary aims were to (1) explore similarities and differences in barriers and facilitators experienced in head and neck cancer versus other cancers, and (2) identify how many studies considered the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on physical activity behaviour. METHODS: CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane (CDSR) were searched for qualitative and mixed methods evidence. Quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool. Thematic synthesis and frequency of reporting were conducted, and results were structured using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour model and Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS: Thirty qualitative and six mixed methods studies were included. Socioeconomic characteristics were not frequently assessed across the included studies. Barriers included side effects and comorbidities (physical capability; skills) and lack of knowledge (psychological capability; knowledge). Having a dry mouth or throat and choking concerns were reported in head and neck cancer, but not across other cancers. Facilitators included improving education (psychological capability; knowledge) on the benefits and safety of physical activity. CONCLUSION: Educating patients and healthcare professionals on the benefits and safety of physical activity may facilitate promotion, uptakeand adherence. Head and neck cancer patients experienced barriers not cited across other cancers, and research exploring physical activity promotion in this patient group is required to improve physical activity engagement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Exercício Físico / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article