Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey of barriers and facilitators to caffeine use for apnoea of prematurity in low- and middle-income countries.
Ginsburg, Amy Sarah; Coleman, Jesse; Waiyego, Mary; Murila, Florence; Macharia, William M; Ochieng, Roseline.
Afiliação
  • Ginsburg AS; Clinical Trials Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Coleman J; Evaluation of Technologies for Neonates in Africa Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Waiyego M; Newborn Unit, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Murila F; Newborn Unit, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Macharia WM; Department of Paediatrics, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Ochieng R; Department of Paediatrics, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Paediatr Int Child Health ; 42(3-4): 137-141, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462339
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

AIM:

To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.

METHODS:

An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.

RESULTS:

A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.

CONCLUSION:

Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC. ABBREVIATIONS AoP Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap Research Electronic Data Capture.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apneia / Cafeína Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apneia / Cafeína Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article