Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Compared with Sevelamer Carbonate in Chinese Dialysis Patients with Hyperphosphataemia: A Randomised, Open-Label, Multicentre, 12-Week Phase III Study.
Liu, Jun; Zuo, Li; Walpen, Sebastian; Bernard, Laurence; Marty, Matthieu; Enoiu, Milica.
Afiliação
  • Liu J; NanFang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, China.
  • Zuo L; Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Walpen S; Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
  • Bernard L; Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
  • Marty M; Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
  • Enoiu M; Vifor Pharma Management Ltd., Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
Nephron ; 148(1): 22-33, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37473746
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) versus sevelamer carbonate in controlling serum phosphorus (sP) in adult Chinese dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia (sP >1.78 mmol/L).

METHODS:

Open-label, randomised (11), active-controlled, parallel group, multicentre, phase III study of SFOH and sevelamer at starting doses corresponding to 1,500 mg iron/day and 2.4 g/day, respectively, with 8-week dose titration and 4-week maintenance (NCT03644264). Primary endpoint was non-inferiority analysis of change in sP from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included sP over time and safety.

RESULTS:

415 patients were screened; 286 were enrolled and randomised (142 and 144 to SFOH and sevelamer, respectively). Mean (SD) baseline sP 2.38 (0.57) and 2.38 (0.52) mmol/L, respectively. Mean (SD) change in sP from baseline to week 12 - 0.71 (0.60) versus -0.63 (0.52) mmol/L, respectively; difference (sevelamer minus SFOH) in least squares means (95% CI) 0.08 mmol/L (-0.02, 0.18) with the lower limit of 95% CI above the non-inferiority margin of -0.34 mmol/L. The SFOH group achieved target sP (1.13-1.78 mmol/L) earlier than the sevelamer group (56.5% vs. 32.8% at week 4) and with a lower pill burden (mean 3.7 vs. 9.1 tablets/day over 4 weeks of maintenance, respectively). Safety and tolerability of SFOH was consistent with previous studies, and no new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION:

SFOH effectively reduced sP from baseline and was non-inferior to sevelamer after 12 weeks of treatment but had a lower pill burden in Chinese dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia; SFOH benefit-risk profile is favourable in Chinese patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sacarose / Hiperfosfatemia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sacarose / Hiperfosfatemia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans País como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article