Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oriental medicine as collaborating treatments with conventional treatments for knee osteoarthritis: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park, Yeon-Cheol; Park, Kyeong-Ju; Goo, Bon-Hyuk; Kim, Jung-Hyun; Seo, Byung-Kwan; Baek, Yong-Hyeon.
Afiliação
  • Park YC; Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KJ; Joint Center, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Goo BH; Department of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Joint Center, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Seo BK; Joint Center, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Baek YH; Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(29): e34212, 2023 Jul 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37478276
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oriental medicine (OM) treatments as monotherapy and add-on therapy compared to conventional treatments for knee osteoarthritis and assess the quality of evidence for these results. OM treatment included acupuncture, herbal medicine, pharmacoacupuncture, and moxibustion. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, 4 Korean medical databases (KoreaMed, Korean Studies Information Service System, Research Information Service System, and Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System), and one Chinese database (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched for articles published between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of OM interventions, single or combined with conventional treatments, on knee osteoarthritis were searched. The risk of bias and quality of evidence of the included studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methods, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 3911 relevant studies were retrieved and only 23 studies were included for systematic review. Most of the studies showed a significant effect on knee osteoarthritis. 21 studies comparing single OM treatment with conventional treatment were included in the meta-analysis. The effect size of standardized mean difference (SMD) was analyzed as a "small effect" with 0.48 (95% CI -0.80 to -0.16, Z = 2.98, P = .003). In addition, a meta-analysis of 4 studies comparing integrative treatment with conventional treatment showed a "very large effect" with 1.52 (95% CI -2.09 to -0.95, Z = 5.19, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that single OM treatment and integrative treatment significantly reduce pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, there is a limited number of RCTs considering integrative treatment which implies more related RCTs should be conducted in the future.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Acupuntura / Osteoartrite do Joelho / Medicina Tradicional do Leste Asiático / Moxibustão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia por Acupuntura / Osteoartrite do Joelho / Medicina Tradicional do Leste Asiático / Moxibustão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article