Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric properties of health-related quality of life instruments used in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review.
De Silva, Sheraya; Chan, Nicholas; Esposito, Katherine; Higgins, Alisa M; Hodgson, Carol L.
Afiliação
  • De Silva S; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. wadu.desilva@monash.edu.
  • Chan N; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Esposito K; Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Higgins AM; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Hodgson CL; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Qual Life Res ; 33(1): 17-29, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37532887
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a patient-reported measure of health status. However, research on the psychometric properties of HRQoL instruments used post-critical care is less common. We conducted a systematic review assessing the psychometric properties of HRQoL instruments used in adult survivors following critical illness. METHODS: Three databases were systematically searched between 1990 and June 2022. Screening articles for eligibility, we selected either development studies for new tools or studies that evaluated psychometric properties, and whose target population represented adult survivors following critical illness. Methodological quality was assessed using the COnsensus-Based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The results of each psychometric property were then assessed for criteria of good psychometric properties (sufficient, insufficient or indeterminate) and qualitatively summarised. Finally, we graded the quality of the evidence using a modified GRADE approach. RESULTS: We retrieved 13 eligible studies from 2,983 records identifying 10 HRQoL instruments used post-critical illness. While high-quality evidence for the considered PROMs was limited primarily due to risk of bias, seven instruments demonstrated sufficient levels of reliability, four instruments presented sufficient hypothesis testing, and two instruments showed sufficient responsiveness. Except the Short Form-36, evidence for psychometric properties of other individual measures was limited to a few studies. CONCLUSION: There was limited evidence demonstrated for the psychometric properties of the included PROMs evaluating HRQoL. Further research is warranted to evaluate the psychometric properties of HRQoL measures, strengthening the evidence for administering these instruments in survivors following critical illness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Estado Terminal Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Estado Terminal Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article