Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation.
Gim, Gyeong-Min; Eom, Kyeong-Hyeon; Kwon, Dong-Hyeok; Jung, Dae-Jin; Kim, Dae-Hyun; Yi, Jun-Koo; Ha, Jae-Jung; Lee, Ji-Hyun; Lee, Seong-Beom; Son, Woo-Jae; Yum, Soo-Young; Lee, Won-Wu; Jang, Goo.
Afiliação
  • Gim GM; Laboratory of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute of Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Eom KH; LARTBio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kwon DH; Laboratory of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute of Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung DJ; LARTBio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim DH; Laboratory of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute of Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yi JK; Gyeongsangbukdo Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju, Republic of Korea.
  • Ha JJ; Gyeongsangbukdo Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JH; Gyeongsangbukdo Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SB; Gyeongsangbukdo Livestock Research Institute, Yeongju, Republic of Korea.
  • Son WJ; LARTBio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yum SY; LARTBio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee WW; LARTBio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jang G; LARTBio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Anim Sci Biotechnol ; 14(1): 103, 2023 Aug 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37543609
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) are needed for gene editing in cattle. In this point of view, electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative.

RESULTS:

First, editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos. Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed by T7E1 assay. With first combination, mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6% ± 13.7% and 54.6% ± 13.5%, respectively. In case of MSTN/BLG, mutation rates were 83.9% ± 23.6% for MSTN, 84.5% ± 18.0% for BLG. Afterwards, the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing. Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP, 4 calves were delivered, and one calf underwent an induction for double KO. Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG, and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes.

CONCLUSIONS:

These data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied. Finally, MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article