Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Promising Biomarkers on Severity and Outcome of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.
Sagcan, Gulseren; Dogan, Zeki; Uzun, Hafize; Cuhadaroglu, Caglar; Okumus, Gulfer; Arseven, Orhan.
Afiliação
  • Sagcan G; Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Dogan Z; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Uzun H; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Atlas University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Cuhadaroglu C; Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Okumus G; Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Arseven O; Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Int J Gen Med ; 16: 3301-3309, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37551292
ABSTRACT

Background:

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a common clinical condition. Its severity ranges from asymptomatic radiological findings to fatal obstructive shock. The potential circulating biomarkers have been studied to predict APE outcomes. This study aimed to explore their predictive power on prognosis in APE. Material and

Method:

It was a prospective observational study between March 2008 and April 2010. All consecutive patients diagnosed with APE were categorized as massive/high-risk, submassive/moderate-risk, and non-massive/low-risk. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT), myoglobin, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and D-dimer levels were measured.

Results:

Of these patients, 14 (29.8%), 16 (34.0%), and 17 (36.2%) patients were categorized as low-risk, moderate-risk, and high risk-patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between the patient groups categorized based on the risk stratification in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. The cTnT, myoglobin, HFABP, and D-dimer levels have also not differed significantly between the groups. There was a significant difference between the groups in respect of NT-proBNP and GDF-15 levels (p=0.009 and p=0.037, respectively). Nine (19.1%) patients had died by the 3rd-month follow-up. Adverse events were seen in 26 (55.3%) patients. GDF-15 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value for predicting any adverse event (cut-off value=9.3 ng/mL, AUC=0.796, CI (confidence interval) 95% 0.653-0.899). NT-ProBNP was determined as the best predictor for mortality (cut-off value=229.2 pg/mL, AUC=0.889, CI 95% 0.756-0.964).

Conclusion:

Higher levels of NT-proBNP and GDF-15 were found to be associated with more severe APE, worse outcomes, and mortality.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article