Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation and psychometric properties of the Persian version of the MISSCARE survey.
Rahimi, Shoeleh; Ebadi, Abbas; Khankeh, Hamid Reza; Eghbali, Mohammad; Sharifi, Azam; Mohammadian, Batol; Lotfi, Mohammad Sajjad.
Afiliação
  • Rahimi S; University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (USWR), Tehran, Iran.
  • Ebadi A; Educational Supervisor of Faghihi Hospital in Shiraz, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fars, Iran.
  • Khankeh HR; Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Eghbali M; Health in Emergency and Disaster research center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Sharifi A; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mohammadian B; Department of Nursing, school of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
  • Lotfi MS; Nahavand School of Allied Medical Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Nurs Open ; 10(9): 6058-6066, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37565382
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To conduct, translate, and psychometric evaluation of the MISSCARE-Persian Survey.

DESIGN:

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Iran in February-June 2021.

METHODS:

The translation of the MISSCARE Survey was accomplished according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Construct validity was performed by (N = 300) exploratory factor analysis and confirmation. To assess the reliability, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and relative stability was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study adhered to COSMIN guidelines.

RESULTS:

The exploratory factor analysis, which resulted in the identification of three factors in the second part of the tool, explained 79.6% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model's good fit of information. The reliability of the first and second parts of the tool was 0.912 and 0.901, respectively. Additionally, the ICC was found to be 0.687 for the first and 0.706 for the second part of the tool.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traduções Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traduções Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article