Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of NovoSorb biodegradable temporising matrix in wound management: a literature review and case series.
Kidd, Thomas; Kolaityte, Valdone; Bajaj, Kuljyot; Wallace, David; Izadi, David; Bechar, Janak.
Afiliação
  • Kidd T; Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
  • Kolaityte V; Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
  • Bajaj K; Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
  • Wallace D; Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
  • Izadi D; Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
  • Bechar J; Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
J Wound Care ; 32(8): 470-478, 2023 Aug 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37572341
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

NovoSorb (Poly-Novo Ltd, Australia) biodegradable temporising matrix (BTM) is a novel artificial dermal matrix. Previous literature is weighted towards its use in burns reconstruction; however, this paper describes its use within a range of wound aetiologies. The authors present one of the largest and most diverse case series to date, and aim to provide an independent benchmark of clinical practice.

METHOD:

A retrospective observational study was performed. Patient demographics and clinical data (wound aetiology, site, total body surface area (TBSA), wound bed, number of debridements, time to BTM integration, time to skin grafting) were collected and subgroup analysis preformed.

RESULTS:

The cohort consisted of 37 patients (acute trauma wounds, n=19; hard-to-heal wounds, n=9; acute infections, n=6; cancer, n=3). Successful BTM integration, allowing subsequent split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), occurred in 70% of cases, despite an overall complication rate of 51%. Mean time from BTM application to STSG was 53 days. There was no difference in STSG outcomes when grafting was performed either before or after the six-week BTM application period. There was no difference when various wound beds (fascia, tendon, periosteum) were compared. Patients >65 years of age were more likely to experience complications; however, this did not affect the speed of integration. The relation of diabetes and smoking to overall integration had no statistical significance.

CONCLUSION:

In comorbid patients in particular, the time between BTM application and STSG may be longer than the manufacturer's recommendation. Furthermore, data suggest greater wound bed optimisation and closer interval monitoring in hard-to-heal/malignant wounds, and in older patients and patients with comorbidities. However, BTM appears robust (even in infection) and is showing promise as a useful reconstructive tool.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pele / Cicatrização Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pele / Cicatrização Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article