Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single-cell analysis reveals key differences between early-stage and late-stage systemic sclerosis skin across autoantibody subgroups.
Clark, Kristina Elizabeth Neergaard; Xu, Shiwen; Attah, Moustafa; Ong, Voon H; Buckley, Christopher Dominic; Denton, Christopher P.
Afiliação
  • Clark KEN; Centre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
  • Xu S; Centre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
  • Attah M; Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Ong VH; Centre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK.
  • Buckley CD; Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Denton CP; Centre for Rheumatology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK c.denton@ucl.ac.uk.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 82(12): 1568-1579, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37580109
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The severity of skin involvement in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) depends on stage of disease and differs between anti-RNA-polymerase III (ARA) and anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA) subsets. We have investigated cellular differences in well-characterised dcSSc patients compared with healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS:

We performed single-cell RNA sequencing on 4 mm skin biopsy samples from 12 patients with dcSSc and HCs (n=3) using droplet-based sequencing (10× genomics). Patients were well characterised by stage (>5 or <5 years disease duration) and autoantibody (ATA+ or ARA+). Analysis of whole skin cell subsets and fibroblast subpopulations across stage and ANA subgroup were used to interpret potential cellular differences anchored by these subgroups.

RESULTS:

Fifteen forearm skin biopsies were analysed. There was a clear separation of SSc samples, by disease, stage and antibody, for all cells and fibroblast subclusters. Further analysis revealed differing cell cluster gene expression profiles between ATA+ and ARA+ patients. Cell-to-cell interaction suggest differing interactions between early and late stages of disease and autoantibody. TGFß response was mainly seen in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in early ATA+dcSSc skin samples, whereas in early ARA+dcSSc patient skin samples, the responding cells were endothelial, reflect broader differences between clinical phenotypes and distinct skin score trajectories across autoantibody subgroups of dcSSc.

CONCLUSIONS:

We have identified cellular differences between the two main autoantibody subsets in dcSSc (ARA+ and ATA+). These differences reinforce the importance of considering autoantibody and stage of disease in management and trial design in SSc.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escleroderma Sistêmico / Esclerodermia Difusa Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escleroderma Sistêmico / Esclerodermia Difusa Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article