Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Take a break: should breaks be enforced during digital breast tomosynthesis reading sessions?
Partridge, George John William; Taib, Adnan Gani; Phillips, Peter; James, Jonathan Jeffrey; Satchithananda, Keshthra; Sharma, Nisha; Morel, Juliet; McAvinchey, Rita; Valencia, Alexandra; Teh, William; Khan, Humaira; Muscat, Elizabeth; Michell, Michael James; Chen, Yan.
Afiliação
  • Partridge GJW; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
  • Taib AG; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
  • Phillips P; Health and Medical Sciences Group, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, UK.
  • James JJ; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham Breast Institute, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
  • Satchithananda K; Department of Breast Radiology and National Breast Screening Training Centre, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Sharma N; Leeds Breast Screening Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospital, York Road, Leeds, LS14 6UH, UK.
  • Morel J; Department of Breast Radiology and National Breast Screening Training Centre, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
  • McAvinchey R; Jarvis Breast Screening Centre, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 1LJ, UK.
  • Valencia A; Avon Breast Screening, Bristol Breast Care Centre, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
  • Teh W; North London Breast Screening Service, Edgware Community Hospital, London, HA8 9BA, UK.
  • Khan H; City, Sandwell and Walsall Breast Screening Service, Birmingham City Hospital, B18 7QH, Birmingham, UK.
  • Muscat E; South West London Breast Screening Service, St George's Hospital, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
  • Michell MJ; Department of Breast Radiology and National Breast Screening Training Centre, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Chen Y; Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. mszyc1@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Eur Radiol ; 34(2): 1388-1398, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37589906
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can improve diagnostic accuracy compared to 2D mammography, but DBT reporting is time-consuming and potentially more fatiguing. Changes in diagnostic accuracy and subjective and objective fatigue were evaluated over a DBT reporting session, and the impact of taking a reporting break was assessed. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Forty-five National Health Service (NHS) mammography readers from 6 hospitals read a cancer-enriched set of 40 DBT cases whilst eye tracked in this prospective cohort study, from December 2020 to April 2022. Eye-blink metrics were assessed as objective fatigue measures. Twenty-one readers had a reporting break, 24 did not. Subjective fatigue questionnaires were completed before and after the session. Diagnostic accuracy and subjective and objective fatigue measures were compared between the cohorts using parametric and non-parametric significance testing.

RESULTS:

Readers had on average 10 years post-training breast screening experience and took just under 2 h (105.8 min) to report all cases. Readers without a break reported greater levels of subjective fatigue (44% vs. 33%, p = 0.04), which related to greater objective fatigue an increased average blink duration (296 ms vs. 286 ms, p < 0.001) and a reduced eye-opening velocity (76 mm/s vs. 82 mm/s, p < 0.001). Objective fatigue increased as the trial progressed for the no break cohort only (ps < 0.001). No difference was identified in diagnostic accuracy between the groups (accuracy 87% vs. 87%, p = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementing a break during a 2-h DBT reporting session resulted in lower levels of subjective and objective fatigue. Breaks did not impact diagnostic accuracy, which may be related to the extensive experience of the readers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT DBT is being incorporated into many mammography screening programmes. Recognising that reporting breaks are required when reading large volumes of DBT studies ensures this can be factored in when setting up reading sessions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials registration number NCT03733106 KEY POINTS • Use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast screening programmes can cause significant reader fatigue. • The effectiveness of incorporating reading breaks into DBT reporting sessions, to reduce mammography reader fatigue, was investigated using eye tracking. • Integrating breaks into DBT reporting sessions reduced reader fatigue; however, diagnostic accuracy was unaffected.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leitura / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leitura / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article