Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Segment anything model for medical image analysis: An experimental study.
Mazurowski, Maciej A; Dong, Haoyu; Gu, Hanxue; Yang, Jichen; Konz, Nicholas; Zhang, Yixin.
Afiliação
  • Mazurowski MA; Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA; Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA; Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Du
  • Dong H; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. Electronic address: haoyu.dong151@duke.edu.
  • Gu H; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
  • Yang J; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
  • Konz N; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Med Image Anal ; 89: 102918, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37595404
ABSTRACT
Training segmentation models for medical images continues to be challenging due to the limited availability of data annotations. Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a foundation model trained on over 1 billion annotations, predominantly for natural images, that is intended to segment user-defined objects of interest in an interactive manner. While the model performance on natural images is impressive, medical image domains pose their own set of challenges. Here, we perform an extensive evaluation of SAM's ability to segment medical images on a collection of 19 medical imaging datasets from various modalities and anatomies. In our experiments, we generated point and box prompts for SAM using a standard method that simulates interactive segmentation. We report the following

findings:

(1) SAM's performance based on single prompts highly varies depending on the dataset and the task, from IoU=0.1135 for spine MRI to IoU=0.8650 for hip X-ray. (2) Segmentation performance appears to be better for well-circumscribed objects with prompts with less ambiguity such as the segmentation of organs in computed tomography and poorer in various other scenarios such as the segmentation of brain tumors. (3) SAM performs notably better with box prompts than with point prompts. (4) SAM outperforms similar methods RITM, SimpleClick, and FocalClick in almost all single-point prompt settings. (5) When multiple-point prompts are provided iteratively, SAM's performance generally improves only slightly while other methods' performance improves to the level that surpasses SAM's point-based performance. We also provide several illustrations for SAM's performance on all tested datasets, iterative segmentation, and SAM's behavior given prompt ambiguity. We conclude that SAM shows impressive zero-shot segmentation performance for certain medical imaging datasets, but moderate to poor performance for others. SAM has the potential to make a significant impact in automated medical image segmentation in medical imaging, but appropriate care needs to be applied when using it. Code for evaluation SAM is made publicly available at https//github.com/mazurowski-lab/segment-anything-medical-evaluation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article