Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome does not guarantee positivity in each lupus anticoagulant assay.
Moore, Gary W; Foxton, Eleanor; Platton, Sean; Yartey, Nada; White, Danielle; MacDonald, Stephen G.
Afiliação
  • Moore GW; Department of Haematology, Specialist Haemostasis Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, London, UK. Electronic address: gary.moore9@nhs.net.
  • Foxton E; Synnovis Haemostasis and Thrombosis Laboratory, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
  • Platton S; The Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Yartey N; East and South East London NHS Pathology Partnership, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • White D; Department of Haematology, Specialist Haemostasis Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • MacDonald SG; Department of Haematology, Specialist Haemostasis Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
J Thromb Haemost ; 21(12): 3539-3546, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37597725
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Triple positivity for all 3 criteria antiphospholipid antibodies confers high risk of symptom development in carriers, and recurrence in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Most triple-positivity studies report lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing as positive without distinguishing between positivity with dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and single-assay positivity or only perform dRVVT. Single LA assay repertoires remain in use in some centers, which risks missing some triple positives. Positivity with both assays may identify higher risk.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of single LA assay positivity in triple-positive patients.

METHODS:

Three hundred forty-two triple-positive profiles from nonanticoagulated patients (237 APS, 45 systemic lupus erythematosus without APS symptoms, and 60 nonclinical criteria) were identified from laboratory databases and assessed for LA positivity by dRVVT and/or APTT.

RESULTS:

Seventy-three of 237 (30.8%) APS samples were LA-positive with 1 assay, 40/237 (16.9%) by dRVVT only, and 33/237 (13.9%) with APTT only. Nineteen of 45 (42.2%) were LA-positive with 1 assay in the systemic lupus erythematosus cohort; 12/45 (26.7%) with dRVVT only and 7/45 (15.5%) with APTT only. Thirty-three of 60 (55.0%) were LA-positive with 1 assay in the nonclinical criteria cohort; 24/60 (40.0%) with dRVVT only and 9/60 (15.0%) with APTT only. The most common solid-phase assay profile was elevated immunoglobulin G aCL and aß2GPI.

CONCLUSION:

Up to 55.0% of triple-positive samples were positive in 1 LA assay, representing significant potential for misdiagnosis and inappropriate management via single LA assay repertoires.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome Antifosfolipídica / Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome Antifosfolipídica / Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article