Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Brain MR Image Synthesis for Tumor Segmentation (BraSyn).
Li, Hongwei Bran; Conte, Gian Marco; Anwar, Syed Muhammad; Kofler, Florian; Ezhov, Ivan; van Leemput, Koen; Piraud, Marie; Diaz, Maria; Cole, Byrone; Calabrese, Evan; Rudie, Jeff; Meissen, Felix; Adewole, Maruf; Janas, Anastasia; Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi; LaBella, Dominic; Moawad, Ahmed W; Farahani, Keyvan; Eddy, James; Bergquist, Timothy; Chung, Verena; Shinohara, Russell Takeshi; Dako, Farouk; Wiggins, Walter; Reitman, Zachary; Wang, Chunhao; Liu, Xinyang; Jiang, Zhifan; Familiar, Ariana; Johanson, Elaine; Meier, Zeke; Davatzikos, Christos; Freymann, John; Kirby, Justin; Bilello, Michel; Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M; Wiest, Roland; Kirschke, Jan; Colen, Rivka R; Kotrotsou, Aikaterini; Lamontagne, Pamela; Marcus, Daniel; Milchenko, Mikhail; Nazeri, Arash; Weber, Marc-André; Mahajan, Abhishek; Mohan, Suyash; Mongan, John; Hess, Christopher; Cha, Soonmee.
Afiliação
  • Li HB; University of Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Conte GM; Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Germany.
  • Anwar SM; Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
  • Kofler F; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
  • Ezhov I; Children's National Hospital, Washington DC, USA.
  • van Leemput K; George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
  • Piraud M; Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Munich, Germany.
  • Diaz M; Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Germany.
  • Cole B; TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
  • Calabrese E; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
  • Rudie J; Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Germany.
  • Meissen F; Finnish Center for Artificial Intelligence, Finland.
  • Adewole M; Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Munich, Germany.
  • Janas A; Sage Bionetworks, USA.
  • Kazerooni AF; Sage Bionetworks, USA.
  • LaBella D; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, USA.
  • Moawad AW; University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Farahani K; University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Eddy J; Department of Informatics, Technical University Munich, Germany.
  • Bergquist T; Medical Artificial Intelligence (MAI) Lab, Crestview Radiology, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Chung V; Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Shinohara RT; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Dako F; Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) I& Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Wiggins W; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, USA.
  • Reitman Z; Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, PA, USA.
  • Wang C; Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
  • Liu X; Sage Bionetworks, USA.
  • Jiang Z; Sage Bionetworks, USA.
  • Familiar A; Sage Bionetworks, USA.
  • Johanson E; Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) I& Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Meier Z; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Davatzikos C; Center for Global Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Freymann J; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, USA.
  • Kirby J; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, USA.
  • Bilello M; Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, USA.
  • Fathallah-Shaykh HM; Children's National Hospital, Washington DC, USA.
  • Wiest R; George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
  • Kirschke J; Children's National Hospital, Washington DC, USA.
  • Colen RR; George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
  • Kotrotsou A; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lamontagne P; PrecisionFDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Marcus D; Booz Allen Hamilton, McLean, VA, USA.
  • Milchenko M; Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) I& Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Nazeri A; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Weber MA; Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21701, USA.
  • Mahajan A; Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
  • Mohan S; Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21701, USA.
  • Mongan J; Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
  • Hess C; Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D) I& Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Cha S; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
ArXiv ; 2023 Jun 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37608932
Automated brain tumor segmentation methods have become well-established and reached performance levels offering clear clinical utility. These methods typically rely on four input magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities: T1-weighted images with and without contrast enhancement, T2-weighted images, and FLAIR images. However, some sequences are often missing in clinical practice due to time constraints or image artifacts, such as patient motion. Consequently, the ability to substitute missing modalities and gain segmentation performance is highly desirable and necessary for the broader adoption of these algorithms in the clinical routine. In this work, we present the establishment of the Brain MR Image Synthesis Benchmark (BraSyn) in conjunction with the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2023. The primary objective of this challenge is to evaluate image synthesis methods that can realistically generate missing MRI modalities when multiple available images are provided. The ultimate aim is to facilitate automated brain tumor segmentation pipelines. The image dataset used in the benchmark is diverse and multi-modal, created through collaboration with various hospitals and research institutions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article