Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Small-Molecule Adsorption Energy Predictions for High-Throughput Screening of Electrocatalysts.
Raghavan, Srishyam; Chaplin, Brian P; Mehraeen, Shafigh.
Afiliação
  • Raghavan S; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 929 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States.
  • Chaplin BP; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 929 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States.
  • Mehraeen S; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 929 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States.
J Chem Inf Model ; 63(17): 5529-5538, 2023 09 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37625148
ABSTRACT
Predicting adsorption energies of small molecules (e.g., OH, OOH, CO) on electrocatalysts involved in electrochemical reactions aids in accelerating the design and screening of electrocatalysts. Avoiding computationally expensive electronic structure calculations increases the speed of such predictions. Geometric and electronic descriptors have been reported to characterize the environment around surface active sites and predict adsorption energies. However, these descriptors cannot be used to predict adsorption energies of small molecules on various substrates, e.g., metal-oxide and nonmetal electrocatalysts. We compare the performance of these descriptors in predicting adsorption energies of small molecules on various electrocatalysts with adsorption energies calculated from density functional theory. We show that two recently developed machine learning algorithms, Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Network (CGCNN) and Atomistic Line Graph Neural Network (ALIGNN), outperform the reported descriptors based on geometric (coordination number of the active site and its nearest neighbors) and electronic (the bond-energy-integrated orbitalwise coordination number, the electronegativity, and the number of valence electrons of the active site) properties in predicting the adsorption energies. Our results suggest that ALIGNN is almost always more accurate than CGCNN in adsorption energy predictions. The improvement ranges from 0.02 to 1.0 eV in the mean absolute errors (MAEs). We also compare the performance of CGCNN and ALIGNN algorithms in predicting the overpotentials of the oxygen evolution reaction occurring on various electrocatalysts with MAEs of 0.06 and 0.05 V, respectively.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article