Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Young adults' reasoning for involving a parent in a genomic decision-making research study.
Pascal, Julia M; McGowan, Michelle L; Blumling, Amy A; Prows, Cynthia A; Lipstein, Ellen A; Myers, Melanie F.
Afiliação
  • Pascal JM; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio, Cincinnati, USA.
  • McGowan ML; College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Blumling AA; Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Prows CA; College of Arts & Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Lipstein EA; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio, Cincinnati, USA.
  • Myers MF; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio, Cincinnati, USA.
J Genet Couns ; 2023 Aug 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632220
ABSTRACT
Young adults have increasing genomic testing opportunities; however, little is known about how equipped they feel about making decisions to learn personal genomic information. We conducted qualitative interviews with 19 young adults, ages 18-21 years old, enrolled in a research study where they made decisions about learning personal genomic risk for developing preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions and carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. Participants had the option to include a parent in their study visit and the decision-making process. The goal of this project was to explore young adults' reasons for involving or not involving a parent in the study and to assess young adults' perspectives about parental roles in their healthcare. Nine participants included a parent in the study and ten did not include a parent. Eleven participants received genomic test results before the interview, while eight participants had not yet received their results at the time of the interview. The study team developed a coding guide and coded interview transcripts inductively and deductively using an interpretive descriptive-analytic approach. Logistical issues dominated solo participants' reasons for not involving a parent in the study, whereas those who involved a parent often cited a close relationship with the parent and the parent's previous involvement in the participant's healthcare as reasons for involving them. Both groups of participants described gradually transitioning to independent healthcare decision-making with age and felt their comfort in medical decision-making depends on the severity of and their familiarity with the situation. Participants recommended that future genomic researchers or clinicians give young adults the option to involve a parent or friend as a support person in research or clinical visits. Although young adults may have different journeys toward independent healthcare decision-making, some may benefit from continued parental or peer involvement after reaching the age of legal adulthood.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article