Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Left-primary & right-auxiliary operation mode in mediastinoscope-assisted radical esophagectomy.
Yuan, Peisong; Hu, Weipeng; Liu, Zheng; Wu, Na; Lin, Haonan; Li, Shiyu; Hu, Yang.
Afiliação
  • Yuan P; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Hu W; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Liu Z; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Wu N; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Lin H; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Li S; Department of Surgical Division I, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Wusheng County, Guangan, 638400, China.
  • Hu Y; Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China. huyangthoracic@126.com.
Surg Endosc ; 37(10): 7884-7892, 2023 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37644153
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) is the most minimally invasive esophagectomy procedure. It is a more challenging procedure and more difficult to be popularized than thoracoscopic surgery. We developed a new MATHE operation mode that provides a clearer visual field and makes the procedures simpler.

METHODS:

A total of 80 patients with esophageal cancer were divided into a control group (n = 29) and a study group (n = 51). The control group underwent classic MATHE, while the study group received modified MATHE. We compared the two groups on operation time; intraoperative blood loss; blood transfusion amount; incidence rate of lung infection, recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) injury, chylothorax, and anastomotic leakage; and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection.

RESULTS:

The study group was significantly better than the control group in operation time (271.78 min vs. 322.90 min, p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (48.63 mL vs. 68.97 mL, p < 0.05), and left paratracheal lymph node (No. 4L) dissection rate (88.24% vs. 24.14%, p < 0.01). No significant differences were identified in the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage, lung complications, or RLNs injury between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

The modified MATHE is easier to perform. Modified MATHE is significantly superior to classic MATHE in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection rate.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Mediastinoscópios Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Mediastinoscópios Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article