Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics of goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation: A scoping review.
Okita, Yuho; Kawaguchi, Yuko; Inoue, Yuki; Ohno, Kanta; Sawada, Tatsunori; Levack, William; Tomori, Kounosuke.
Afiliação
  • Okita Y; School of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Kawaguchi Y; Department of Rehabilitation, Kaikoukai Rehabilitation Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
  • Inoue Y; Central Rehabilitation Department, Yokohama Rousai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Ohno K; Major of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sawada T; Major of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Levack W; Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Tomori K; Major of Occupational Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Rehabil ; 38(2): 234-250, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37644842
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This scoping review aims to map the literature on goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation, exploring their characteristics, target users and supporting evidence to inform practice and future research in this area.

METHODS:

We completed a comprehensive search of four databases to identify relevant articles on tools for goal setting in rehabilitation. We followed Arkey and O'Malley's scoping review process to guide article selection, data extraction and data analysis.

RESULTS:

We identified a total of 165 studies that reported on 55 different goal-setting tools, including tools for goal selection and goal documentation (n = 31), goal setting and intervention planning (n = 15), and for measuring the quality of the goal-setting process (n = 9). Over half of the tools were primarily designed for use in rehabilitation of physical disabilities (n = 32). Some tools fell under multiple sub-categories based on their characteristics as follows 22 framework tools, 12 interview tools, 9 outcome measurement tools for goal achievement, 6 outcome measurement tools for goal quality and 25 documentation tools. The majority of goal-setting instruments targeted goals at the level of activity and participation (n = 51) and aimed to facilitate a client-centred or shared decision-making approach to rehabilitation planning (n = 46).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides a comprehensive overview of existing goal-setting tools, highlighting their characteristics, target users and identified needs. These findings can enhance practitioners' awareness of the range of goal-setting tools available and can enable more effective utilization of these tools in clinical practice. Further research should investigate how clinicians can combine multiple tools to deliver goal setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoas com Deficiência / Objetivos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoas com Deficiência / Objetivos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article