Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remote blended treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation: A single-arm proof-of-concept trial.
Büscher, Rebekka; Teismann, Tobias; Hartleitner, Paula; Klein, Jan Philipp; Baumeister, Harald; Sander, Lasse B.
Afiliação
  • Büscher R; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Teismann T; Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.
  • Hartleitner P; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Klein JP; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Luebeck University, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Baumeister H; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  • Sander LB; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37658710
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

New digital treatment formats may reduce barriers to treatment for individuals with suicidal ideation. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a remote blended care programme for this population, defined as acceptability, demand, practicality, adaptation, indications of efficacy and safety.

METHODS:

We conducted a mixed-methods single-arm trial for proof-of-concept. Participants were eligible if they were at least 18 years old, had sufficient German proficiency, a Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation score ≥2, internet access and lived near the outpatient clinic. The treatment consisted of 12 sessions of cognitive-behavioural videotherapy combined with online modules over 6 weeks.

RESULTS:

We included 10 participants. All patients were satisfied with the treatment; most patients (80%) reported unpleasant memories resurfacing. All patients completed all therapy sessions and a mean of 13.7 modules (SD = 5.7); three patients switched to face-to-face treatment, in one case due to safety concerns. All patients and most therapists (83.3%) found the treatment overall practicable. Most patients (66.7%) and therapists (66.7%) considered remote treatment equivalent to face-to-face therapy. There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION:

While promising, the results suggest changes to the programme might be needed, particularly for patients' safety. A controlled feasibility trial should investigate temporary deteriorations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article