Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma Routine Clinical Practice: A Modified Delphi Study.
Ramasamy, Karthik; Avet-Loiseau, Hervé; Hveding Blimark, Cecilie; Delforge, Michel; Gay, Francesca; Manier, Salomon; Martinez-Lopez, Joaquín; Mateos, Maria Victoria; Mohty, Mohamad; van de Donk, Niels W C J; Weisel, Katja.
Afiliação
  • Ramasamy K; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Avet-Loiseau H; University Institute of Cancer Toulouse, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Hveding Blimark C; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Delforge M; University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Gay F; University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
  • Manier S; University of Lille, Lille, France.
  • Martinez-Lopez J; 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Mateos MV; University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca Biomedical Research Institute (IBSAL), CIC, Ciberonc, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Mohty M; Hospital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, INSERM UMRs 938, Paris, France.
  • van de Donk NWCJ; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Weisel K; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hemasphere ; 7(9): e942, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37663672
We used a modified Delphi approach to establish areas of consensus and nonconsensus regarding the utility of determining measurable residual disease (MRD) to assess multiple myeloma (MM) treatment response, which may inform disease management and design of future clinical trials. This modified Delphi study incorporated 2 iterative rounds of surveys to evaluate the opinions of an expert panel of 61 practicing hematological oncologists from across 14 countries in Europe concerning the use of MRD testing in MM management. Survey 1 assessed experts' opinions on MRD testing in different clinical situations and associated challenges. Survey 2 focused on the lack of consensus areas identified in survey 1. Consensus to an individual question was defined a priori as 75% agreement or disagreement by the panel. From the 2 rounds of surveys, the experts reached consensus agreement that MRD testing should be performed in newly diagnosed or relapsed patients who achieved complete response (CR) or better after transplantation. In transplant-ineligible patients, experts recommended MRD testing in those who are ≤70 years old and in CR. If a patient was previously positive on positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT), both MRD and PET/CT should be assessed at CR. MRD testing should be performed ≤6 months after transplantation and every 6-12 months in continuously treated patients in CR. There was no consensus on making treatment decisions based on MRD status. MRD testing is an important component of clinical management in MM. Additional data will further clarify the role of MRD in guiding treatment decisions.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article