Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of composite park quality with park use in four diverse cities.
Kaczynski, Andrew T; Wende, Marilyn; Hughey, Morgan; Stowe, Ellen; Schipperijn, Jasper; Hipp, Aaron; Javad Koohsari, Mohammad.
Afiliação
  • Kaczynski AT; Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Wende M; Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Hughey M; Department of Health and Human Performance, School of Health Sciences, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Stowe E; Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  • Schipperijn J; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
  • Hipp A; Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Javad Koohsari M; School of Advanced Science and Technology, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan.
Prev Med Rep ; 35: 102381, 2023 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37680855
ABSTRACT
Park use has numerous health benefits. However, little research has investigated how the combination of park facilities, amenities, and conditions are related to park visitation. This study examined the association between a novel composite park quality metric and the use of specific parks, including variations by demographics. Data were collected in 128 census block groups across four diverse cities in the USA. Adults (n = 262) used an online, map-based survey to indicate which parks within one half-mile they had used within the past 30 days. All parks (n = 263) were audited using the Community Park Audit Tool, and a composite quality metric was calculated by standardizing and averaging six key components access, facilities, amenities, aesthetic features, quality concerns, and neighborhood concerns. A total of 2429 participant-park pairs were analyzed. The average park quality score was 40.4/100 (s.d. = 30.2). For the full sample, a greater park quality score was significantly related to park use (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03) such that for each one unit increase in a park's quality score, there was a 2% increase in the likelihood of the park being used. There was also a significant interaction by gender, with park quality associated with park use among females (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.02-1.05) but not males (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.99-1.02). Enhancing overall park quality may increase the likelihood of a park being used. Future research can explore the utility of this comprehensive quality metric for predicting other health behaviors and outcomes and how interventions to enhance park quality augment park use and health over time.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article