Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: A Global Landscape Review.
Bertelsen, Neil; Dewulf, Lode; Ferrè, Silvia; Vermeulen, Rebecca; Schroeder, Karlin; Gatellier, Laureline; Sargeant, Ify; Luzuriaga, Daniela; Chapman, Hayley; Brooke, Nicholas.
Afiliação
  • Bertelsen N; HTAi Patient & Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group, Neil Bertelsen Consulting, Berlin, Germany.
  • Dewulf L; Independent Expert, Les Contamines-Montjoie, France.
  • Ferrè S; National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
  • Vermeulen R; Roche Pharmaceuticals, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  • Schroeder K; Independent Patient Representative, Jackson Heights, NY, USA.
  • Gatellier L; National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sargeant I; NPO Japan Brain Tumor Alliance, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Luzuriaga D; Twist Medical, Burlingame, CA, USA.
  • Chapman H; Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Brooke N; Patient Focused Medicines Development (PFMD), Brussels, Belgium. hayley@thesynergist.org.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 58(1): 63-78, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37743397
BACKGROUND: Working with patients through meaningful patient engagement (PE) and incorporating patient experience data (PXD) is increasingly important in medicines and medical device development. However, PE in the planning, organization, generation, and interpretation of PXD within regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) decision-making processes remains challenging. We conducted a global review of the PE and PXD landscape to identify evolving resources by geography to support and highlight the potential of integration of PE and PXD in regulatory assessment and HTA. METHODS: A review of literature/public information was conducted (August 2021-January 2023), led by a multistakeholder group comprising those with lived or professional experience of PE and PXD, to identify relevant regulatory and HTA initiatives and resources reviewed and categorized by geography and focus area. RESULTS: Overall, 53 relevant initiatives/resources were identified (global, 14; North America, 11; Europe, 11; Asia, nine; UK, six; Latin America, one; Africa, one). Most focused either on PE (49%) or PXD (28%); few (11%) mentioned both PE and PXD (as largely separate activities) or demonstrated an integration of PE and PXD (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrates increasing interest in PE, PXD, and guidance on their use individually in decision-making. However, more work is needed to offer guidance on maximizing the value of patient input into decisions by combining both PE and PXD into regulatory and HTA processes; the necessity of integrating PE in the design and interpretation of PXD programs should be highlighted. A co-created framework to achieve this integration is part of a future project.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica Tipo de estudo: Health_technology_assessment Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica Tipo de estudo: Health_technology_assessment Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article