Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating Response Trends of Chlormethine/Mechlorethamine Gel in Patients With Stage I-IIA Mycosis Fungoides: Analysis of Individual Patient Data From a Randomized Controlled Phase II Study to Facilitate Optimal Treatment Experiences.
Geskin, Larisa J; Angello, James T; Bagot, Martine; Guenova, Emmanuella; Nikbakht, Neda; Querfeld, Christiane; Scarisbrick, Julia J.
Afiliação
  • Geskin LJ; Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: ljg2145@cumc.columbia.edu.
  • Angello JT; Helsinn Therapeutics (U.S.) Inc., Iselin, NJ.
  • Bagot M; Department of Dermatology, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
  • Guenova E; University Hospital Lausanne (CHUV) and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Nikbakht N; Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Querfeld C; Division of Dermatology, Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
  • Scarisbrick JJ; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 24(1): 40-47, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37802679
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Chlormethine (CL) gel was approved for treatment of mycosis fungoides based on the pivotal 201 trial (NCT00168064). Data visualization from individual patients is a powerful tool for discovery of hidden treatment trends. Here, we present a post hoc analysis of individual patient data from the pivotal trial to provide a more granular depiction of treatment and response changes over time, with an emphasis on end of treatment status. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Individual patient response data were plotted over a 12-month treatment period to visualize patient experiences while using CL gel. Responder status was assigned according to end-of-treatment Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) score, and patients were classified as early (≤4 months) or late responders based on timing of response. Baseline and active treatment characteristics were compared between early and late responders, and baseline body surface area (BSA) was compared between responders and patients with stable or progressive disease.

RESULTS:

Data from 123 patients with baseline and postbaseline results were included. At the end of treatment, 64.2%/55.3% were responders, 30.9%/34.1% had stable disease, and 4.9%/10.6% had progressive disease by CAILS and mSWAT, respectively. Among patients who responded to treatment, 64.6% and 35.4% were early and late responders, respectively. Response pattern analysis also identified patients with an intermittent response or initial progressive disease. Baseline BSA was not associated with responder status. Late responders had longer treatment duration and higher postbaseline plaque elevation, while early responders had a higher frequency of dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Results presented here can facilitate optimal treatment experiences for patients starting CL gel.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Micose Fungoide Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Micose Fungoide Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article