Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations for Cell-Free DNA Assay Validations: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists.
Lockwood, Christina M; Borsu, Laetitia; Cankovic, Milena; Earle, Jonathan S L; Gocke, Christopher D; Hameed, Meera; Jordan, Danielle; Lopategui, Jean R; Pullambhatla, Mrudula; Reuther, Jacquelyn; Rumilla, Kandelaria M; Tafe, Laura J; Temple-Smolkin, Robyn L; Terraf, Panieh; Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.
Afiliação
  • Lockwood CM; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, Washington. Electronic add
  • Borsu L; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Cankovic M; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Earle JSL; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut; Hartford Pathology Associates, Hartford, Connecticut.
  • Gocke CD; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Hameed M; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Jordan D; Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Lopategui JR; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Pullambhatla M; Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Reuther J; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Invitae, San Francisco, California.
  • Rumilla KM; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Tafe LJ; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Temple-Smolkin RL; Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Terraf P; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Tsimberidou AM; Liquid Biopsy Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Unit 455, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
J Mol Diagn ; 25(12): 876-897, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37806433
ABSTRACT
Diagnosing, selecting therapy for, and monitoring cancer in patients using a minimally invasive blood test represents a significant advance in precision medicine. Wide variability exists in how circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays are developed, validated, and reported in the literature, which hinders clinical adoption and may negatively impact patient care. Standardization is needed for factors affecting ctDNA assay performance and reporting, including pre-analytical variables, analytical considerations, and elements of laboratory assay reporting. The Association for Molecular Pathology Clinical Practice Committee's Liquid Biopsy Working Group (LBxWG), including organizational representation from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists, has undertaken a full-text data extraction of 1228 ctDNA publications that describe assays performed in patients with lymphoma and solid tumor malignancies. With an emphasis on clinical assay validation, the LBxWG has developed a set of 13 best practice consensus recommendations for validating, reporting, and publishing clinical ctDNA assays. Recommendations include reporting key pre-analytical considerations and assay performance metrics; this analysis demonstrates these elements are inconsistently included in publications. The LBxWG recommendations are intended to assist clinical laboratories with validating and reporting ctDNA assays and to ensure high-quality data are included in publications. It is expected that these recommendations will need to be updated as the body of literature continues to mature.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácidos Nucleicos Livres / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácidos Nucleicos Livres / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article