Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparisons of procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes between SMARTTOUCH SURROUNDFLOW catheter and other catheters for atrial fibrillation radiofrequency catheter ablation: a systematic literature review.
Li, Jianyong; Zhou, Guifang; Li, Xinzhong; Huang, Senlin; Lin, Hairuo; Lin, Shaopeng; Tan, Liang; Chen, Wendong; Huang, Xiaobo; Wang, Yuegang.
Afiliação
  • Li J; Department of Cardioloqy, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhou G; Department of Cardioloqy, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li X; Department of Cardioloqy, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Huang S; Department of Cardioloqy, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Lin H; Department of Cardioloqy, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Lin S; Department of Cardioloqy, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Tan L; Changsha Normin Health Technology Ltd, Changsha, China.
  • Chen W; Normin Health Consulting Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Huang X; THETA Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wang Y; Department of Cardioloqy, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China chw47922@163.com.
BMJ Open ; 13(10): e075579, 2023 10 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37848300
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

SMARTTOUCH SURROUNDFLOW (STSF) catheter is the new generation of SMARTTOUCH (ST) catheter with an upgraded irrigation system for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS:

This systematic literature review searched the major English and Chinese bibliographic databases from 2016 to 2022 for any original clinical studies assessing the STSF catheter for RFCA in AF patients. Meta-analysis with a random effects model was used for evidence synthesis.

RESULTS:

Pooled outcomes from 19 included studies indicated that STSF catheter was associated with a significantly shorter procedure time (weighted mean difference (WMD) -17.4 min, p<0.001), shorter ablation time (WMD -6.6 min, p<0.001) and lower catheter irrigation fluid volume (WMD -492.7 mL, p<0.001) than ST catheter. Pooled outcomes from four included studies with paroxysmal AF patients reported that using the STSF catheter for RFCA was associated with a significantly shorter ablation time (WMD -5.7 min, p<0.001) and a lower risk of 1-year postablation arrhythmia recurrence (rate ratio 0.504, p<0.001) than the SURROUNDFLOW (SF) catheter. Significant reductions in procedure time and ablation time associated with the STSF catheter were also reported in the other four studies using non-ST/SF catheters as the control. Overall complications of STSF catheter and control catheters were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS:

Using the STSF catheter was superior to using the ST catheter to conduct RFCA for AF by significantly reducing procedure time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time and irrigation fluid volume. The superiority of the STSF catheter over the SF catheter and other non-ST/SF catheters for RFCA needs further confirmation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article