Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Premorbid glenoid anatomy reconstruction from contralateral shoulder 3-dimensional measurements: a computed tomography scan analysis of 260 shoulders.
Giraudon, Théo; Morvan, Yannick; Walch, Arnaud; Walch, Gilles; Werthel, Jean-David.
Afiliação
  • Giraudon T; Imascap, Plouzané, France. Electronic address: theo.giraudon@stryker.com.
  • Morvan Y; Imascap, Plouzané, France.
  • Walch A; Hôpital Pierre Zobda-Quitman, Fort-de-France, France.
  • Walch G; Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.
  • Werthel JD; Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 33(4): 792-797, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37852431
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) aims to reconstruct the premorbid anatomy of a pathologic shoulder. A healthy contralateral shoulder could be useful as a template in planning TSA. The symmetry between the left and right shoulders in healthy patients remains to be proved. The purpose of this study was to compare the 3-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid between sides in a healthy population.

METHODS:

A multinational computed tomography scan database was retrospectively reviewed for all healthy bilateral shoulders in patients aged between 18 and 50 years. One hundred thirty pairs of healthy shoulder computed tomography scans were analyzed, and glenoid version, inclination, width, and height, as well as glenoid lateral offset and scapula lateral offset, were measured. All anatomic measures were computed with Blueprint, validated 3-dimensional planning software. The intraclass correlation coefficient was determined for each measure between left and right shoulders. The minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated using the following formula MDC=2×1.96×Standarderrorofmeasurement.

RESULTS:

The comparison between 130 pairs of healthy scapulae showed statistically significant differences in absolute values between right and left glenoid version (-5.3° vs. -4.6°, P < .01), inclination (8.4° vs. 9.3°, P < .01), and width (25.6 mm vs. 25.4 mm, P < .01), as well as scapula offset (105.8 mm vs. 106.2 mm, P < .01). Glenoid height was comparable between right and left shoulders (33.3 mm vs. 33.3 mm, P = .9). The differences between the means were always inferior to the MDC regarding glenoid version, inclination, height, and width, as well as scapula offset. Very strong intraclass correlation coefficients between the left and right shoulders were found for all evaluated paired measures.

CONCLUSION:

Healthy contralateral scapulae are highly reliable to predict inclination, height, width, and scapula offset and are reliable to predict version of a given scapula. Paired right and left scapulae were not statistically symmetrical regarding mean glenoid version, inclination, and width, as well as scapula offset. Nevertheless, the reported differences were not higher than the MDC for this cohort, confirming that healthy contralateral shoulders can be a useful template in TSA preoperative planning.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Cavidade Glenoide Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Cavidade Glenoide Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article