Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Society (TASS) barriers to the application of artificial intelligence in medicine: A systematic review.
Li, Linda T; Haley, Lauren C; Boyd, Alexandra K; Bernstam, Elmer V.
Afiliação
  • Li LT; Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States; McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics at UT Health Houston, 7000 Fannin St, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: L
  • Haley LC; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: lauren.c.haley@uth.tmc.edu.
  • Boyd AK; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: alexandra.k.boyd@uth.tmc.edu.
  • Bernstam EV; McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics at UT Health Houston, 7000 Fannin St, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77030, United States; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: elmer.v.bernstam@u
J Biomed Inform ; 147: 104531, 2023 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884177
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and predictive analytics, has shown great promise in health care. Despite its strong potential, there has been limited use in health care settings. In this systematic review, we aim to determine the main barriers to successful implementation of AI in healthcare and discuss potential ways to overcome these challenges.

METHODS:

We conducted a literature search in PubMed (1/1/2001-1/1/2023). The search was restricted to publications in the English language, and human study subjects. We excluded articles that did not discuss AI, machine learning, predictive analytics, and barriers to the use of these techniques in health care. Using grounded theory methodology, we abstracted concepts to identify major barriers to AI use in medicine.

RESULTS:

We identified a total of 2,382 articles. After reviewing the 306 included papers, we developed 19 major themes, which we categorized into three levels the Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Social levels (TASS). These themes included Lack of Explainability, Need for Validation Protocols, Need for Standards for Interoperability, Need for Reporting Guidelines, Need for Standardization of Performance Metrics, Lack of Plan for Updating Algorithm, Job Loss, Skills Loss, Workflow Challenges, Loss of Patient Autonomy and Consent, Disturbing the Patient-Clinician Relationship, Lack of Trust in AI, Logistical Challenges, Lack of strategic plan, Lack of Cost-effectiveness Analysis and Proof of Efficacy, Privacy, Liability, Bias and Social Justice, and Education.

CONCLUSION:

We identified 19 major barriers to the use of AI in healthcare and categorized them into three levels the Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Social levels (TASS). Future studies should expand on barriers in pediatric care and focus on developing clearly defined protocols to overcome these barriers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Inteligência Artificial / Medicina Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Inteligência Artificial / Medicina Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article