Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Willingness to Use a Pharmacy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Service: A National Survey of U.S. Adults.
Shah, Parth D; Wangen, Mary; Rohweder, Catherine L; Waters, Austin R; Odebunmi, Olufeyisayo O; Marciniak, Macary W; Ferrari, Renée M; Wheeler, Stephanie B; Brenner, Alison T.
Afiliação
  • Shah PD; Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Wangen M; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Rohweder CL; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Waters AR; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Odebunmi OO; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Marciniak MW; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Ferrari RM; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Wheeler SB; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Brenner AT; Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 33(1): 63-71, 2024 01 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37909917
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We aimed to understand U.S. adults' willingness to use a pharmacy-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT) distribution service for routine colorectal cancer screening called PharmFIT using Diffusion of Innovation Theory, evaluating patient's appraisals of the program's relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity.

METHODS:

From March to April 2021, we conducted a national online survey of 1,045 U.S. adults ages 45 to 75. We identified correlates of patient willingness to use PharmFIT using structural equation modeling.

RESULTS:

Most respondents (72%) were willing to get a FIT from their pharmacy for their regular colorectal cancer screening. Respondents were more willing to participate in PharmFIT if they perceived higher relative advantage ($\hat{\beta}$= 0.184; confidence interval, CI95% 0.055-0.325) and perceived higher compatibility ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.422; CI95% 0.253-0.599) to get screened in a pharmacy, had longer travel times to their primary health care provider ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.007; CI95% 0.004-0.010). Respondents were less willing to participate in PharmFIT if they were 65 years or older ($\hat{\beta}$ = -0.220; CI95% -0.362 to -0.070).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most U.S. adults would be willing to participate in PharmFIT for their routine colorectal cancer screening. Patient perceptions of the relative advantage and compatibility of PharmFIT were strongly associated with their willingness to use PharmFIT. Pharmacies should account for patient preferences for these two traits of PharmFIT to increase adoption and use. IMPACT Pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening may be a viable public health strategy to significantly increase equitable access to screening for U.S. residents.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmácias / Farmácia / Neoplasias Colorretais Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmácias / Farmácia / Neoplasias Colorretais Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article