Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Joint line position change in primary total knee arthroplasty: a radiographic analysis comparing conventional and robotic techniques.
Cozzarelli, Nicholas F; DeSimone, Cristian A; D'Amore, Taylor; Sherman, Matthew B; Lonner, Jess H.
Afiliação
  • Cozzarelli NF; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. nick.cozzarelli@rothmanortho.com.
  • DeSimone CA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
  • D'Amore T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
  • Sherman MB; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
  • Lonner JH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, 125 South 9th Street Suite 1000, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Int Orthop ; 48(4): 1023-1030, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946052
PURPOSE: Joint line (JL) position change in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may alter knee biomechanics and impact function. The purpose of this study was to compare the change in JL position between robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) and conventional TKA (C-TKA). METHODS: A retrospective, radiographic analysis was conducted of patients who underwent RA-TKA and C-TKA to compare JL position change. JL position was measured in consecutive RA-TKAs and C-TKAs performed by four fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Statistical analysis was done utilizing t-tests and Mann Whitney U tests, with statistical significance being defined as a p value < 0.05. RESULTS: Six hundred total RA-TKAs and 400 total C-TKAs were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in patient baseline characteristics such as body mass index, range of motion, and tibiofemoral coronal alignment. RA-TKAs were associated with an average of 0.04 (2.2) mm JL position change, and C-TKAs were associated with an average 0.5 (3.2) mm JL position change (p = 0.030). There were inter-surgeon differences when comparing the change in JL position for RA-TKAs and C-TKAs between the four participating surgeons. CONCLUSION: RA-TKA leads to better preservation of the JL position than C-TKA, and this seems to be dependent on the arthroplasty surgeon's preferences and techniques during TKA. Whether this statistically significant difference is clinically relevant needs to be further investigated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Osteoartrite do Joelho / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Prótese do Joelho Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Osteoartrite do Joelho / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Prótese do Joelho Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article