Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Patient-Centered Intervention Reduces Disparities in Remote Monitoring in Patients With Implanted Cardiac Devices.
Rosman, Lindsey; Mazzella, Anthony J; Gu, Xiangmei; Vives, Carola Alfaro; Lanctin, David; Natera, Ana C; Gehi, Anil; Lampert, Rachel.
Afiliação
  • Rosman L; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: lindsey_rosman@med.unc.edu.
  • Mazzella AJ; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Gu X; Medtronic Inc, Mounds View, Minnesota, USA.
  • Vives CA; Medtronic Inc, Mounds View, Minnesota, USA.
  • Lanctin D; Medtronic Inc, Mounds View, Minnesota, USA.
  • Natera AC; Medtronic Inc, Mounds View, Minnesota, USA.
  • Gehi A; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Lampert R; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 10(2): 316-330, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37999668
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Remote monitoring (RM) is recommended for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, yet many individuals, especially those living in underserved communities, fail to receive this guideline-directed care. Multilevel interventions that target patient and clinic-level barriers to RM care may be beneficial.

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to evaluate a remotely delivered, patient-centered intervention to improve RM activation and adherence and reduce disparities in RM care.

METHODS:

The intervention provides home delivery of remote monitor, phone-based education, monitor setup, and facilitation of first transmission. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using RM data from 190,643 patients (71.6 ± 12.7 years of age, 40.5% female) implanted with a pacemaker or defibrillator at 4,195 U.S. clinics between October 2015 and October 2019. Outcomes included RM activation (12 weeks and 1-year postimplantation) and adherence to clinic-scheduled transmissions. Patients receiving a cardiovascular implantable electronic deviceimplant 0 to 730 days before (control group, n = 95,861) and after (intervention group, n = 94,782) intervention launch were compared using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. Multivariable models included patient, clinic, and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics.

RESULTS:

The odds of achieving guideline-recommended activation were significantly higher in the intervention group at 12 weeks (OR 2.99; 76.7% vs 60.9%; P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR 3.05; 88.2% vs 79.3%; P < 0.001). Adherence to scheduled transmissions was also higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (OR 2.18; 89.1% vs 81.9%; P < 0.001). Preintervention disparities in RM activation and adherence were reduced in underserved groups following the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS:

A remotely delivered patient-centered intervention was associated with earlier activation and improved adherence to RM while reducing disparities in RM care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article