Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for positive follow-up blood cultures in Gram-negative bacteremia among immunocompromised patients with neutropenia.
Ranganath, Nischal; Yetmar, Zachary A; Saleh, Omar Abu; Tande, Aaron J; Shah, Aditya S.
Afiliação
  • Ranganath N; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Yetmar ZA; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Saleh OA; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Tande AJ; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Shah AS; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 26(1): e14203, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010744
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Gram-negative bacillary bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) is a frequent clinical challenge among immunocompromised hosts and is associated with a high mortality. The utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for GN-BSI in this population, particularly in the setting of neutropenia, is poorly defined.

METHODS:

We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study between the period of July 2018 and April 2022 to investigate the utility of FUBCs and delineate risk factors for positive cultures among neutropenic patients with monomicrobial GN-BSI. Univariate logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors associated with positive FUBCs.

RESULTS:

Of 206 patients, 98% had FUBCs performed, and 9% were positive. Risk factors for positive FUBCs included multidrug-resistant GN infection (OR 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-8.72) and vascular catheter source (OR 4.82; CI 1.76-13.17). Among patients lacking these risk factors, the prevalence of positive FUBCs was low (2.8%) and the negative predictive value was 92%. Those with positive and negative FUBCs had similar rates of all-cause mortality (16.7% vs. 16.6%; p = .942) and microbiologic relapse (11.1% vs. 6.0%; p = .401) within 90-days of treatment completion. However, positive FUBCs were associated with prolonged hospitalization and longer duration of antimicrobial therapy.

CONCLUSION:

Positive FUBCs were infrequent in neutropenic patients with GN-BSI, and their occurrence did not significantly impact mortality or microbiologic relapse. Risk factors for positive FUBCs included multidrug resistant Gram-negative infection and vascular catheter source. Prospective studies will be necessary to elucidate the benefits and risks of FUBCs when managing GN-BSI in patients with underlying immune compromise.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas / Bacteriemia / Sepse / Neutropenia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas / Bacteriemia / Sepse / Neutropenia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article