Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of 18F-based PSMA radiotracers with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang, Siyu; Ong, Sean; McKenzie, Dean; Mirabelli, Adam; Chen, David C; Chengodu, Thilakavathi; Murphy, Declan G; Hofman, Michael S; Lawrentschuk, Nathan; Perera, Marlon.
Afiliação
  • Huang S; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. huangsiyu1998@gmail.com.
  • Ong S; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • McKenzie D; EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Mirabelli A; Research Development & Governance Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Chen DC; Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Chengodu T; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Murphy DG; Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Hofman MS; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Lawrentschuk N; Young Urology Researchers Organisation (YURO), Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Perera M; EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38017295
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has become an increasingly established imaging modality in the staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Numerous PSMA-based tracers are currently available, however, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal radiotracer(s) for PSMA PET/CT. This study aims to investigate whether Fluorine-18 (18F)-labelled PSMA PET/CT is significantly different from Gallium-68 (68Ga) in primary diagnosis and/or secondary staging of prostate cancer following biochemical recurrence.

METHODS:

A critical review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science databases was performed in May 2023 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies that directly compared 18F-based PSMA radiotracers and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in terms of the normal organ SUV or the lesion SUV or the detection rate were assessed. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS:

Twenty-four studies were analysed. [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]PSMA-1007 were the two most commonly studied 18F based PSMA tracers. [18F]JK-PSMA-7, [18F]rhPSMA-7, [18F]AlF-PSMA-11 were the new tracers evaluated in a limited number of studies. Overall, [18F]DCFPyL was observed to have a similar lesion detection rate to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 with no increase in false positive rates. [18F]PSMA-1007 was found to have a greater local lesion detection rate because of its predominant hepatobiliary excretory route. However, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was observed to have a similar local lesion detection rate in studies that administer patients with furosemide prior to the scan. In addition, [18F]PSMA-1007 was found to have a significant number of benign bone uptakes.

CONCLUSIONS:

[18F]DCFPyL was observed to be similar to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. [18F]PSMA-1007 was observed to be less preferrable to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 due to its high benign bone uptakes. Overall, there was not enough evidence in differentiating the radiotracers based on their clinical impacts.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article