Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of expectancy versus actual gluten intake on gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms in non-coeliac gluten sensitivity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicentre study.
de Graaf, Marlijne C G; Lawton, Clare L; Croden, Fiona; Smolinska, Agnieszka; Winkens, Bjorn; Hesselink, Martine A M; van Rooy, Gonny; Weegels, Peter L; Shewry, Peter R; Houghton, Lesley A; Witteman, Ben J M; Keszthelyi, Daniel; Brouns, Fred J P H; Dye, Louise; Jonkers, Daisy M A E.
Afiliação
  • de Graaf MCG; Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Lawton CL; School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Croden F; School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Smolinska A; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Winkens B; Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Hesselink MAM; Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • van Rooy G; Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Weegels PL; Laboratory of Food Chemistry, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands; European Bakery Innovation Centre, Sonneveld Group, Papendrecht, Netherlands.
  • Shewry PR; Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.
  • Houghton LA; Division of Gastroenterology and Surgical Sciences, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Witteman BJM; Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands; Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, Netherlands.
  • Keszthelyi D; Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Brouns FJPH; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Dye L; School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Jonkers DMAE; Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. Electronic address: d.jonkers@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(2): 110-123, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040019
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many individuals without coeliac disease or wheat allergy reduce their gluten intake because they believe that gluten causes their gastrointestinal symptoms. Symptoms could be affected by negative expectancy. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of expectancy versus actual gluten intake on symptoms in people with non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS).

METHODS:

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicentre study was done at the University of Leeds (Leeds, UK), Maastricht University (Maastricht, the Netherlands), and Wageningen University and Research (Wageningen, the Netherlands). People aged 18-70 years with self-reported NCGS (ie, gastrointestinal symptoms within 8 h of gluten consumption) without coeliac disease and wheat allergy were recruited. Participants had to follow a gluten-free or gluten-restricted diet for at least 1 week before (and throughout) study participation and had to be asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic (overall gastrointestinal symptom score ≤30 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) while on the diet. Participants were randomly assigned (1111; blocks of eight; stratified by site and gender) to one of four groups based on the expectation to consume gluten-containing (E+) or gluten-free (E-) oat bread for breakfast and lunch (two slices each) and actual intake of gluten-containing (G+) or gluten-free (G-) oat bread. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to the actual gluten assignment, and participants were also masked to the expectancy part of the study. The primary outcome was overall gastrointestinal symptom score on the VAS, which was measured at and corrected for baseline (before breakfast) and hourly for 8 h, with lunch served after 4 h, and analysed per-protocol. Safety analysis included all participants incorporated in the per-protocol analysis. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05779358, and has ended.

FINDINGS:

Between Oct 19, 2018, and Feb 14, 2022, 165 people were screened and 84 were randomly assigned to E+G+ (n=21), E+G- (n=21), E-G+ (n=20), or E-G- (n=22). One person in the E+G+ group was excluded due to not following test day instructions, leaving 83 participants in the per-protocol analysis. Median age was 27·0 years (IQR 21·0-45·0), 71 (86%) of 83 people were women, and 12 (14%) were men. Mean overall gastrointestinal symptom score was significantly higher for E+G+ (16·6 mm [95% CI 13·1 to 20·0]) than for E-G+ (6·9 mm [3·5 to 10·4]; difference 9·6 mm [95% CI 3·0 to 16·2], p=0·0010) and E-G- (7·4 mm [4·2 to 10·7]; difference 9·1 mm [2·7 to 15·6], p=0·0016), but not for E+G- (11·7 mm [8·3 to 15·1]; difference 4·9 mm [-1·7 to 11·5], p=0·28). There was no difference between E+G- and E-G+ (difference 4·7 mm [-1·8 to 11·3], p=0·33), E+G- and E-G- (difference 4·2 mm [-2·2 to 10·7], p=0·47), and E-G+ and E-G- (difference -0·5 mm [-7·0 to 5·9], p=1·0). Adverse events were reported by two participants in the E+G- group (itching jaw [n=1]; feeling lightheaded and stomach rumbling [n=1]) and one participant in the E-G+ group (vomiting).

INTERPRETATION:

The combination of expectancy and actual gluten intake had the largest effect on gastrointestinal symptoms, reflecting a nocebo effect, although an additional effect of gluten cannot be ruled out. Our results necessitate further research into the possible involvement of the gut-brain interaction in NCGS.

FUNDING:

Government of the Netherlands Topsector Agri & Food Top Consortium for Knowledge and Innovation, AB Mauri Global Bakery Ingredients, Baking Industry Research Trust, Borgesius-Albert Heijn, CSM Innovation Centre, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), DSM Food Specialties, Fazer, Healthgrain Forum, the International Association for Cereal Science and Technology, the International Wheat Gluten Association, Lantmännen, Mondelez International, Nederlands Bakkerij Centrum, Nutrition & Santé, Puratos, Rademaker, Sonneveld Group, and Zeelandia HJ Doeleman.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Celíaca / Hipersensibilidade a Trigo Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Celíaca / Hipersensibilidade a Trigo Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article