Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brain Age Estimation on a Dementia Cohort Using FLAIR MRI Biomarkers.
Crystal, Owen; Maralani, Pejman J; Black, Sandra; Fischer, Corinne; Moody, Alan R; Khademi, April.
Afiliação
  • Crystal O; From the Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering (O.C., A.K.), Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ocrystal@torontomu.ca.
  • Maralani PJ; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology (O.C., A.K.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Black S; Department of Medical Imaging (P.J.M., A.R.M., A.K.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Fischer C; Institute of Medical Science (S.B., C.F.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Moody AR; Department of Neurology (S.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Khademi A; Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program (S.B.), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 44(12): 1384-1390, 2023 12 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050032
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

The prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease presents an imperative intervention window. This work focuses on using brain age prediction models and biomarkers from FLAIR MR imaging to identify subjects who progress to Alzheimer's disease (converting mild cognitive impairment) or those who remain stable (stable mild cognitive impairment). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A machine learning model was trained to predict the age of normal control subjects on the basis of volume, intensity, and texture features from 3239 FLAIR MRI volumes. The brain age gap estimation (BrainAGE) was computed as the difference between the predicted and true age, and it was used as a biomarker for both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Differences in biomarker means, slopes, and intercepts were investigated using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Correlation analysis was performed between brain age gap estimation and established Alzheimer's disease indicators.

RESULTS:

The brain age prediction model showed accurate results (mean absolute error = 2.46 years) when testing on held out normal control data. The computed BrainAGE metric showed significant differences between the stable mild cognitive impairment and converting mild cognitive impairment groups in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, most notably showing significant differences up to 4 years before conversion to Alzheimer's disease. A significant correlation was found between BrainAGE and previously established Alzheimer's disease conversion biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS:

The BrainAGE metric can allow clinicians to consider a single explainable value that summarizes all the biomarkers because it considers many dimensions of disease and can determine whether the subject has normal aging patterns or if he or she is trending into a high-risk category using a single value.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Alzheimer / Disfunção Cognitiva Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Alzheimer / Disfunção Cognitiva Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article