Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AAPM Task Group Report 311: Guidance for performance evaluation of fluorescence-guided surgery systems.
Pogue, Brian W; Zhu, Timothy C; Ntziachristos, Vasilis; Wilson, Brian C; Paulsen, Keith D; Gioux, Sylvain; Nordstrom, Robert; Pfefer, T Joshua; Tromberg, Bruce J; Wabnitz, Heidrun; Yodh, Arjun; Chen, Yu; Litorja, Maritoni.
Afiliação
  • Pogue BW; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Zhu TC; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Ntziachristos V; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Wilson BC; Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging, Technical University of Munich, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Paulsen KD; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Gioux S; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Nordstrom R; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Pfefer TJ; Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Tromberg BJ; Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
  • Wabnitz H; National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Yodh A; Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany.
  • Chen Y; Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Litorja M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Med Phys ; 51(2): 740-771, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38054538
ABSTRACT
The last decade has seen a large growth in fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) imaging and interventions. With the increasing number of clinical specialties implementing FGS, the range of systems with radically different physical designs, image processing approaches, and performance requirements is expanding. This variety of systems makes it nearly impossible to specify uniform performance goals, yet at the same time, utilization of different devices in new clinical procedures and trials indicates some need for common knowledge bases and a quality assessment paradigm to ensure that effective translation and use occurs. It is feasible to identify key fundamental image quality characteristics and corresponding objective test methods that should be determined such that there are consistent conventions across a variety of FGS devices. This report outlines test methods, tissue simulating phantoms and suggested guidelines, as well as personnel needs and professional knowledge bases that can be established. This report frames the issues with guidance and feedback from related societies and agencies having vested interest in the outcome, coming from an independent scientific group formed from academics and international federal agencies for the establishment of these professional guidelines.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Diagnóstico por Imagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Diagnóstico por Imagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article