Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion.
Ahmed, Aziza; Evans, Dabney P; Jackson, Jason; Meier, Benjamin Mason; Tomori, Cecília.
Afiliação
  • Ahmed A; BOSTON UNIVERSITY, BOSTON, MA, USA.
  • Evans DP; EMORY UNIVERSITY, ATLANTA, GA, USA.
  • Jackson J; MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMBRIDGE, MA, USA.
  • Meier BM; UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL, NC, USA.
  • Tomori C; JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, BALTIMORE, MD, USA.
J Law Med Ethics ; 51(3): 485-489, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38088610
ABSTRACT
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health - the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Dobbs furthers a longstanding ideology of individual responsibility in public health, neglecting collective responsibility for better health outcomes. Such an ideology on individual responsibility not only enables a shrinking of public health infrastructure for reproductive health, it facilitates the rise of reproductive coercion and a criminal legal response to pregnancy and abortion. This commentary situates Dobbs in the context of a long historical shift in public health that increasingly places burdens on individuals for their own reproductive health care, moving away from the possibility of a robust state public health infrastructure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Induzido / Coerção Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Induzido / Coerção Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article